evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Han River Water Use Charge & Watershed Management Fund (South Korea)

South Korea · Seoul · See the South Korea profile

Since 1999, South Korea's Han River Law has charged downstream Seoul-area water users a use fee (KRW80 to KRW170/m3) to compensate 11 upstream districts for land-use restrictions, funding land purchases and water-quality programmes, though pollution disputes persist.

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Environment - Han River Basin Environmental Office / Seoul Metropolitan Government
Period
1999-present
Keywords
water use charge, watershed compensation, transboundary river basin, upstream-downstream benefit sharing

Description

Seoul, Incheon and surrounding Gyeonggi-do municipalities draw drinking water from the Han River, whose headwaters lie in less-developed upstream districts of Gyeonggi-do, Gangwon-do and Chungcheongbuk-do. To fund water-quality protection at the source while compensating upstream communities for land-use restrictions, the Han River Law of 1999 introduced a mandatory water use charge on downstream users.

The charge started at KRW80 per cubic metre in 1999 and rose to KRW170 per cubic metre by 2012, a level maintained since. Revenue flows into the Han River Watershed Management Fund, administered by the Ministry of Environment's Han River Basin Environmental Office, which finances land purchases in reservoir-protection and waterfront zones, resident assistance programmes in the 11 covered upstream districts, local environmental-facility construction, and water-quality improvement projects, alongside the operation of a joint Han River Watershed Management Committee.

Academic benefit-transfer studies estimate the aggregate value of the Han River's managed water resources at roughly KRW449 billion (about US$449 million) per year in net benefits, equivalent to about KRW7,728 (roughly US$7.70) per downstream household per month -- figures used to justify the ongoing charge.

The scheme is also a documented cautionary case. Over the 1999-2014 period the charge raised a cumulative KRW5,187.6 billion (about US$5.19 billion), yet peer-reviewed reviews report that water pollution problems in the Han River basin persist, and that downstream and upstream stakeholders remain in dispute: downstream residents in some periods have refused to pay or pushed to reduce or abolish the charge, while upstream residents argue that land-use regulations should ease and compensation should increase. The mechanism has proven durable but has not resolved the underlying water-quality and equity tensions it was designed to address.

Read the full analysis: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/048548a1-2f56-5890-89b7-a90b9574cc11/content

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 60

New York City Catskills watershed protection

United States of America

Rather than build an $8–10bn filtration plant, New York City invests in protecting its Catskill/Delaware watershed — ~$2.5bn since 1997 …