San Francisco's water utility keeps about 85% of the city's supply flowing from the pristine Hetch Hetchy Reservoir without filtration — a rare EPA/California waiver sustained through decades of National Park Service watershed protection instead of costly treatment plants.
~85%
Share of SFPUC water supply from Hetch Hetchy Reservoir
~117 billion gallons
Hetch Hetchy Reservoir storage capacity
1934
Water deliveries to San Francisco began
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC)
Period
{'end': '', 'start': '1934'}
Keywords
municipal water utility, filtration avoidance, watershed protection, National Park Service partnership
Context
Since the O'Shaughnessy Dam was completed in 1923 and water deliveries to San Francisco began in 1934, the city's public utility (SFPUC) has drawn most of its drinking water from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, fed by snowmelt from a protected, high-elevation granite watershed inside Yosemite National Park. About 85% of SFPUC's water supply comes from this source.
Activities
Because the water originates in a legally protected wilderness catchment largely free of grazing, logging and development, it meets the bacteriological and turbidity criteria the US EPA and California's drinking water regulator require for a 'filtration avoidance' determination — one of only a handful granted to a major US city. Rather than building and operating a filtration plant for this share of its supply, SFPUC maintains its exemption by funding ongoing watershed protection: security patrols, sanitary surveys carried out on a regular cycle, and a rolling multi-year watershed protection agreement with the National Park Service and US Forest Service covering the Tuolumne River watershed.
Conclusions
The arrangement is not without risk. Because the exemption depends on the watershed's condition remaining pristine, degradation from wildfire, climate change or increased visitor pressure inside Yosemite could force SFPUC to filter this supply after all — a reminder that avoided-cost watershed protection is conditional, not permanent, and requires continuous monitoring investment rather than a one-off payment.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No specific budget figure disclosed; costs are ongoing watershed patrols, sanitary surveys and NPS/US Forest Service agreement funding rather than a filtration-plant capital cost.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Filtration-avoidance arrangement sustained continuously since dam completion (1923) and water deliveries beginning (1934).
Staffing & skills
SFPUC watershed security patrols, National Park Service and US Forest Service watershed-management partners
Conditions for success
Legally protected, largely undeveloped high-elevation watershed inside Yosemite National Park
Seattle's ~100,000-acre Cedar River Municipal Watershed programme won EPA's rare 'Limited Alternative to Filtration' status in 2004, saving over $100 …