evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ikalahan Ancestral Domain Forest Carbon Initiative — Kalahan Educational Foundation (Philippines)

Philippines · Santa Fe · See the Philippines profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 1973 the Ikalahan people of Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines have self-governed a forest reserve under one of the country's earliest ancestral-domain titles; a measured 38,000 tonnes of carbon sequestered in 2002 fed a decade-long attempt to monetise the forest through carbon mar

more than 38,000 tonnes
Forest carbon sequestered (single-year measurement) (2002)
~15,000 ha
Forest area under community ownership
~900 ha
Proposed afforestation/reforestation area for carbon credits (2009-2012 proposal)
60 %
Proposed landholder share of carbon payments

Details

Promoter
Kalahan Educational Foundation (KEF) / Ikalahan (Kalanguya) indigenous communities
Period
1973-2012
Keywords
indigenous forest management, agroforestry, ancestral domain, carbon-stock assessment

Context

The Kalahan Educational Foundation (KEF) was established in 1973 as the legal entity through which five Ikalahan (Kalanguya indigenous) villages in the Caraballo Mountains of Nueva Vizcaya and Nueva Ecija, northern Luzon, Philippines, secured community ownership over roughly 15,000 hectares of forest within their wider ancestral domain, later recognised at a larger scale under the Philippines' Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act. The community developed the Forest Improvement Technology (FIT), a selective, small-scale continuous-culling method designed to accelerate carbon accumulation in old-growth forest while maintaining canopy cover, with landholders retaining use rights over specific parcels.

Objectives

From 2003, the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and partners worked with KEF under the RUPES (Rewarding Upland Poor for Environmental Services) programme, and later prepared a proposal (2009-2012) to develop roughly 900 hectares of afforestation and reforestation within the ancestral domain toward Clean Development Mechanism or REDD+ carbon credits, with a benefit-sharing design that would have allocated 60% of any carbon payments directly to landholders.

Activities

A University of the Philippines Los Baños study measured that the Kalahan Forest Reserve sequestered more than 38,000 tonnes of carbon in 2002 alone, providing an early, academically documented baseline of the reserve's carbon value. Preparation work for the carbon-finance proposal included forest inventories, a Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal, and a 2012 market-facing event in Manila to seek buyers.

Results

Despite this multi-year preparation, available sources report no completed registration or issuance of tradeable carbon credits from the project; the initiative appears to have remained at the feasibility and negotiation stage rather than reaching a monetised, verified transaction.

Conclusions

Kalahan is documented here as a mixed case: it demonstrates one of the longest-running, best-governed examples of indigenous community forest stewardship in Southeast Asia, with real, independently measured carbon-stock data, but illustrates how governance strength and biophysical evidence alone did not translate into a completed carbon-finance transaction over nearly a decade of effort.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No project costs are reported in the source content; the activities described (forest inventories, a Rapid Carbon Stock Appraisal, and a market event) suggest a modest-scale feasibility effort relative to large infrastructure PES schemes -- rated low cost, a conservative inference given the absence of published cost figures.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Community forest governance has run since 1973 (50+ years); the carbon-finance initiative specifically spanned roughly 2003-2012 (9 years) without reaching completion -- rated long timeline.
Staffing & skills
Kalahan Educational Foundation (community governance body), Ikalahan/Kalanguya indigenous community landholders, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) technical partners, University of the Philippines Los Baños researchers (carbon measurement)

Conditions for success

  • Long-standing (since 1973), legally recognised ancestral-domain community forest governance
  • Locally developed Forest Improvement Technology (FIT) selective-culling method to grow carbon stock while maintaining canopy cover
  • Independent academic carbon-stock measurement (UPLB 2002) provided a credible baseline
  • Clear benefit-sharing design (60% to landholders) built into the proposal

Common failure modes

  • Nearly a decade (2003-2012) of forest inventories, carbon-stock appraisal and market-facing efforts (2012 Manila event) did not result in completed CDM/REDD+ registration or any issued/verified carbon credits
  • Strong governance and biophysical evidence were insufficient on their own to secure a buyer or complete a monetised carbon transaction

Where it fits

Governance type
indigenous community self-governance under ancestral domain title
Scale
community forest reserve, ~15,000 ha
Income level
lower-middle-income

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful