evidoria

What works in Philippines

All catalogues

38
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 30 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Philippines

Drawn from: Virtualahan — Universal-Design Digital Skills Training and Jobs for Persons with Disabilities · Free Wi-Fi for All – Philippines National Internet Access Programme · Philippines Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710, 2009) — Mandatory 5% Gender Budget Across All Government Agencies · DICT Memorandum Circular 2017-004 — The Philippine Web Accessibility Policy · Community Mortgage Program — The Philippines' Community Land-Purchase Financing Scheme · QBO Innovation Hub — Philippines' Multi-Agency Startup Accelerator · BOB — The Philippine Central Bank's AI Chatbot Now Automates 89% of 14.4 Million Annual Complaints · Women and Children Protection Units (WCPU) — Philippines' Hospital-Based One-Stop GBV and Child Abuse Response Network

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Inclusiveness / equity +18 pts 60 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +18 pts 93 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence +15 pts 60 here · 45 average

Transferability / replicability +9 pts 69 here · 59 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +9 pts 62 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion +8 pts 61 here · 52 average

Weaknesses

Evaluated outcomes -10 pts 75 here · 84 average

Innovation level -10 pts 53 here · 63 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -10 pts 40 here · 50 average

Documented learning -14 pts 60 here · 74 average

Efficiency -19 pts 25 here · 44 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Inclusiveness / equity
60 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
93 · 76
Evaluation evidence
60 · 45
Transferability / replicability
69 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Equity & inclusion
61 · 52
Scalability & sustainability
69 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
52 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
53 · 50
Sustainability (ongoing)
81 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
62 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
36 · 37
Governance, certification & transferability
62 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
27 · 31
Evidence of learning impact
21 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Evaluated outcomes
75 · 84
Innovation level
53 · 63
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
40 · 50
Documented learning
60 · 74
Efficiency
25 · 44
Curator validation
50 · 74

Coloured bar: Philippines. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Virtualahan — Universal-Design Digital Skills Training and Jobs for Persons with Disabilities · 96

Free Wi-Fi for All – Philippines National Internet Access Programme · 92

Philippines Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710, 2009) — Mandatory 5% Gender Budget Across All Government Agencies · 85

DICT Memorandum Circular 2017-004 — The Philippine Web Accessibility Policy · 84

Community Mortgage Program — The Philippines' Community Land-Purchase Financing Scheme · 81

QBO Innovation Hub — Philippines' Multi-Agency Startup Accelerator · 81

BOB — The Philippine Central Bank's AI Chatbot Now Automates 89% of 14.4 Million Annual Complaints · 80

Women and Children Protection Units (WCPU) — Philippines' Hospital-Based One-Stop GBV and Child Abuse Response Network · 78

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Philippines concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more