evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

India's Talking ATM Mandate: Braille Keypads and Audio Guidance for Blind Bank Customers

India · Mumbai · See the India profile · See the Mumbai profile

Top 59% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2009 India's central bank has required banks to serve blind customers on equal terms; a 2014 directive made it binding that every new ATM include audio guidance and a Braille keypad, after regulators found earlier advisories widely ignored.

Details

Promoter
Reserve Bank of India / Indian Banks' Association
Period
2009-ongoing
Keywords
banking, disability accessibility, fintech regulation, financial inclusion

Description

In September 2005 India's Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities ruled that a blind customer denied a chequebook by a bank was unlawful discrimination, and ordered banks to make cheque, ATM and locker facilities usable by blind customers. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) circulated that order to all banks in 2006 and reissued non-discrimination guidance in 2009, but implementation stayed patchy and voluntary.
On 1 July 2014 the RBI moved from advisory to mandate: every new ATM installed by a bank from that date had to be a 'talking ATM' with audio output and a Braille keypad, and banks had to file a public roadmap for converting existing machines, reviewed periodically by each bank's Customer Service Committee. The Indian Banks' Association had already published, in February 2013, a technical standard defining what a genuinely accessible ATM booth and interface should contain, covering wheelchair users as well as blind and low-vision customers.
Union Bank of India opened what it billed as the country's first fully accessible, talking ATM in Ahmedabad in June 2012, ahead of the national deadline, and other public-sector banks followed piecemeal. Disability-rights organisations such as XRCVC (Xavier's Resource Centre for the Visually Challenged) and the Score Foundation's EYEWAY portal have tracked the rollout since, publishing retrospective assessments; their reports describe an uneven picture in which many talking ATMs exist on paper or sit non-functional, rather than a rigorously measured compliance rate.
This is a case where regulatory intent is well documented but independent, quantified compliance data is thin: no nationwide audit figure could be verified against a primary source, so evidence here should be read as strong on policy design and weak on confirmed outcomes.

Read the full analysis: https://www.rbi.org.in/commonman/Upload/English/Notification/PDFs/72MC010714CS.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful