evidoria

What works in Mumbai

All catalogues · India profile

14
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
23%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Mumbai

Drawn from: BarrierBreak — Mumbai's Disability-Led Digital Accessibility and Inclusive Design Consultancy · Parivartan — Coaching Boys Into Men, a Cricket-Based Bystander Programme · Internet Saathi — Women-Led Digital Literacy Network, India · India's Talking ATM Mandate: Braille Keypads and Audio Guidance for Blind Bank Customers · Does Management Matter? Accenture–Stanford Field Experiment in Mumbai Textile Plants · Union Bank of India's SPARSH — India's First Braille-Embossed Credit Card for Blind and Visually Impaired Customers · AI Saathi for Educators -- Maharashtra Makes AI Literacy Training Compulsory for 750,000 Teachers · Project SUDARSAN & R(AI)DAR — India's SEBI Uses AI to Flag Over 100,000 Pieces of Misleading Financial Content

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Evaluation evidence +18 pts 67 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +13 pts 50 here · 37 average

Sustainability +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +9 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -14 pts 75 here · 89 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity -26 pts 17 here · 43 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Achievement / evidence -38 pts 50 here · 88 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Evaluation evidence
67 · 49
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 37
Sustainability
89 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 57
Effectiveness
75 · 68
Impact on gender equality
75 · 71
Transferability / replicability
63 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 47
Scalability & sustainability
57 · 62
Innovation
56 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Documented learning
67 · 74
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 64
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
75 · 89
Curator validation
50 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
17 · 43
Efficiency
0 · 33
Achievement / evidence
50 · 88

Coloured bar: Mumbai. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

BarrierBreak — Mumbai's Disability-Led Digital Accessibility and Inclusive Design Consultancy · 92

Parivartan — Coaching Boys Into Men, a Cricket-Based Bystander Programme · 74

Internet Saathi — Women-Led Digital Literacy Network, India · 74

India's Talking ATM Mandate: Braille Keypads and Audio Guidance for Blind Bank Customers · 68

GEMS (Gender Equity Movement in Schools) — ICRW's Classroom Curriculum on Gender and Violence for Young Adolescents in Mumbai, Scaled Across Maharashtra · 67

Does Management Matter? Accenture–Stanford Field Experiment in Mumbai Textile Plants · 57

Union Bank of India's SPARSH — India's First Braille-Embossed Credit Card for Blind and Visually Impaired Customers · 56

AI Saathi for Educators -- Maharashtra Makes AI Literacy Training Compulsory for 750,000 Teachers · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more