evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ISFMI Southern Africa Savanna Fire Management Pilot — Adapting Australia's Carbon Methodology to Miombo Woodlands

Botswana · Kasane · See the Botswana profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 76% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2019, Australia's savanna-burning carbon method has been piloted in Botswana and extended to Zambia, Mozambique and Angola with Green Climate Fund backing. A 2025 drone fuel survey in Kafue National Park confirms feasibility, but no credits are yet verified.

±27%
Fuel-model error margin (surface-level fuel) (2025)
ISFMI Southern Africa Savanna Fire Management Pilot — Adapting Australia's Carbon Methodology to Miombo Woodlands

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
International Savanna Fire Management Initiative (ISFMI)
Period
2019–present
Keywords
carbon markets, fire management, forestry, climate finance

Context

Northern Australia's Indigenous-led savanna burning carbon methodology -- shifting fires to the early dry season -- has generated verified carbon credits for over a decade. In 2019 the Australian Government commissioned the International Savanna Fire Management Initiative (ISFMI) to run a four-year feasibility pilot in Botswana, testing whether the approach could be adapted to Southern Africa's miombo woodlands; it was subsequently extended to Zambia, Mozambique and Angola, funded principally by the Green Climate Fund.

Results

A 2025 peer-reviewed study built a bottom-up fuel-load inventory using drone-mounted cameras and Sentinel-2 imagery across five sites in Botswana, Zambia and Mozambique. The resulting fuel model has an error margin of roughly ±27% for surface-level fuel -- accurate enough to be judged technically viable -- though accuracy drops for coarser woody debris.

Conclusions

This remains a methodology-development and readiness-funding stage: technical feasibility is confirmed by published research, but no Southern African savanna-burning carbon credits have yet been issued or independently verified, unlike the mature scheme it is modelled on in northern Australia.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
International Savanna Fire Management Initiative (ISFMI), Australian Government, Green Climate Fund readiness projects

Conditions for success

  • adaptation of Australia's verified savanna-burning carbon methodology to miombo woodlands
  • drone and satellite-based fuel-load inventory confirming technical feasibility

Common failure modes

  • no carbon credits yet issued or independently verified for the Southern African adaptation

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful