evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Japan's Kurumin Certification for Child-Rearing-Supportive Employers

Japan · Tokyo · See the Japan profile

Since 2007, Japan's MHLW certifies employers meeting childcare-leave targets under the 'Kurumin' mark. Over 4,900 firms were certified by early 2025, though no independent study isolates the certification's own causal effect.

Japan's Kurumin Certification for Child-Rearing-Supportive Employers

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Japan
Period
2007–present
Keywords
work-life balance, parental leave, workplace certification, family-friendly employment

Description

Under Japan's Act on Advancement of Measures to Support Raising Next-Generation Children, employers with more than 100 staff must file a public action plan for work-life-balance support. Companies that meet their plan's goals and satisfy the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's published standards can apply for 'Kurumin' certification, and higher-performing employers can reach 'Platinum Kurumin' status; a 'Try Kurumin' entry tier was added in April 2022.

Certification standards are numeric and gender-specific: employers must reach defined thresholds for the share of eligible female employees taking childcare leave (around 75% or higher) and, separately, growing minimum thresholds for male childcare-leave uptake — historically a stark gender gap in Japan — alongside limits on excessive overtime. The Ministry publishes and periodically tightens these criteria, most recently in a 2025 revision, and maintains a public prefecture-by-prefecture register of certified employers, which can be used in public-procurement scoring and recruitment marketing.

As of February 2025, secondary reporting citing the Ministry's own published certification register put the cumulative total at 4,943 Kurumin-certified companies and 724 Platinum Kurumin companies, up from a much smaller base at the scheme's 2007 launch. The certification measures compliance with input targets (leave-uptake rates, overtime limits) rather than downstream outcomes, and — because participation is voluntary — the sources reviewed do not include an independent study isolating how much of any observed gain is caused by the scheme itself versus self-selection by already family-friendly employers.

Read the full analysis: https://www.nissay.co.jp/enjoy/keizai/185.html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful