evidoria

What works in Japan

All catalogues

58
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
4%
strong evidence, of 51 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Japan

Japan has implemented several evidence-based policies and services to address social inclusion and support vulnerable populations. Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform increased fathers' paternity leave uptake from 17.1% to 40.5% between FY2022 and FY2024. Yasashii Nihongo established a plain-language design standard now adopted across all 47 prefectural governments to improve accessibility for foreign residents. Japan Post's Mimamori provides home visits for isolated elderly people, with evidence showing mental-health gains (WHO-5 score increase from 14.2 to 15.3) among the most socially isolated subgroup. These practices demonstrate Japan's use of both policy reform and commercial or public-service innovation to address demographic challenges and inclusion gaps, though the evidence focuses on specific populations rather than comprehensive national outcomes.

Drawn from: Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · Yasashii Nihongo (Easy Japanese) — Turning Disaster-Response Research into a Nationwide Plain-Language Design Standard · Mirairo ID — Japan's Digital Disability Certificate That Became a Publicly Listed Accessibility Business · Japan Post's Mimamori — Postal-Worker Home Visits for Elderly Living Alone · Raku-Raku Phone/Smartphone — Fujitsu's User-Researched Handset Series for Older Adults · Everyone's Public Website Operational Guidelines — Japan's Mandatory Accessibility Testing & Disclosure Regime · MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection · Fukuoka City Startup Special Zone — Japan's First Global Startup Deregulation Zone

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +29 pts 56 here · 27 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +24 pts 71 here · 47 average

Evaluation evidence +22 pts 71 here · 49 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +19 pts 82 here · 64 average

Sustainability +18 pts 96 here · 78 average

Curator validation +16 pts 89 here · 73 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Scalability beyond pilot +12 pts 74 here · 62 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +12 pts 59 here · 48 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +8 pts 65 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -15 pts 28 here · 43 average

Efficiency -20 pts 11 here · 32 average

Impact on gender equality -25 pts 44 here · 70 average

Achievement / evidence -31 pts 56 here · 87 average

Effectiveness -55 pts 11 here · 66 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
56 · 27
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
71 · 47
Evaluation evidence
71 · 49
Governance, capability & sustainability
82 · 64
Sustainability
96 · 78
Curator validation
89 · 73
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Scalability beyond pilot
74 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
59 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
65 · 57
Transferability / demonstrated replication
68 · 60
Innovation level
66 · 62
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
52 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
29 · 26
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
7 · 6
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
89 · 89
Evaluated outcomes
78 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
69 · 74
Equity & inclusion
42 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
28 · 43
Efficiency
11 · 32
Impact on gender equality
44 · 70
Achievement / evidence
56 · 87
Effectiveness
11 · 66

Coloured bar: Japan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · 96

Yasashii Nihongo (Easy Japanese) — Turning Disaster-Response Research into a Nationwide Plain-Language Design Standard · 96

Mirairo ID — Japan's Digital Disability Certificate That Became a Publicly Listed Accessibility Business · 96

Japan Post's Mimamori — Postal-Worker Home Visits for Elderly Living Alone · 92

Raku-Raku Phone/Smartphone — Fujitsu's User-Researched Handset Series for Older Adults · 92

Everyone's Public Website Operational Guidelines — Japan's Mandatory Accessibility Testing & Disclosure Regime · 88

MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection · 87

Fukuoka City Startup Special Zone — Japan's First Global Startup Deregulation Zone · 86

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Japan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more