evidoria

What works in Japan

All catalogues

47
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 39 assessed
2
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Japan

Japan has implemented several targeted reforms to support demographic and social challenges. Paternity leave uptake doubled from 17.1% to 40.5% between FY2022 and FY2024 following the 2022 Child Care Leave Law amendment, though a government target of 85% by 2030 remains ahead. Japan Post repurposed its 20,000-branch network to deliver monthly home visits for elderly living alone, though evidence of mental-health gains is limited to the most socially isolated. The country has also invested in accessibility standards—requiring government bodies to test websites against JIS X 8341-3:2016 and publish results, and certifying AI bridge-inspection technologies, with certified tools growing from 12 to 215 between 2019 and 2025—though compliance remains partial in several domains.

Drawn from: Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · Japan Post's Mimamori — Postal-Worker Home Visits for Elderly Living Alone · Raku-Raku Phone/Smartphone — Fujitsu's User-Researched Handset Series for Older Adults · Everyone's Public Website Operational Guidelines — Japan's Mandatory Accessibility Testing & Disclosure Regime · MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection · Fukuoka City Startup Special Zone — Japan's First Global Startup Deregulation Zone · Kitakyushu's City-to-City Model — Exporting Japanese Waste-Management Expertise to 78 Cities in 16 Countries · NDLOCR — Japan's National Diet Library Doubles Historical-Text Recognition Accuracy With AI

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +30 pts 75 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +17 pts 48 here · 31 average

Sustainability +17 pts 95 here · 78 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +16 pts 81 here · 64 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +12 pts 62 here · 50 average

Curator validation +11 pts 86 here · 74 average

Scalability beyond pilot +11 pts 75 here · 64 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication +8 pts 68 here · 60 average

Weaknesses

Evaluated outcomes -13 pts 71 here · 85 average

Inclusiveness / equity -15 pts 27 here · 42 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -15 pts 22 here · 37 average

Efficiency -30 pts 14 here · 44 average

Achievement / evidence -34 pts 57 here · 91 average

Impact on gender equality -51 pts 29 here · 80 average

Effectiveness -63 pts 14 here · 77 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
75 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
48 · 31
Sustainability
95 · 78
Governance, capability & sustainability
81 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
62 · 50
Curator validation
86 · 74
Scalability beyond pilot
75 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
68 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
57 · 51
Evidence of impact / measured public value
65 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
10 · 7
Innovation level
64 · 63
Evidence of learning impact
28 · 28
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
86 · 91
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
69 · 76
Equity & inclusion
44 · 52
Evaluated outcomes
71 · 85
Inclusiveness / equity
27 · 42
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 37
Efficiency
14 · 44
Achievement / evidence
57 · 91
Impact on gender equality
29 · 80
Effectiveness
14 · 77

Coloured bar: Japan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Japan's 2022 Child Care Leave Law Reform — Postnatal Paternity Leave (産後パパ育休) · 96

Japan Post's Mimamori — Postal-Worker Home Visits for Elderly Living Alone · 92

Raku-Raku Phone/Smartphone — Fujitsu's User-Researched Handset Series for Older Adults · 92

Everyone's Public Website Operational Guidelines — Japan's Mandatory Accessibility Testing & Disclosure Regime · 88

MLIT's Inspection Support Technology Performance Catalog — Japan's National Certification System for AI Bridge-Damage Detection · 87

Fukuoka City Startup Special Zone — Japan's First Global Startup Deregulation Zone · 86

Kitakyushu's City-to-City Model — Exporting Japanese Waste-Management Expertise to 78 Cities in 16 Countries · 81

NDLOCR — Japan's National Diet Library Doubles Historical-Text Recognition Accuracy With AI · 80

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Japan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more