evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Jodhpur's AI-Assisted Census Assessment — Grading 70,000 Students' Answer Sheets in Days

India · Jodhpur · See the India profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 73% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Jodhpur district (Rajasthan) scaled an AI-assisted answer-sheet grading pilot from 54 schools/3,000 students in October 2025 to 1,000+ schools and 70,000+ students by April 2026, cutting a multi-week grading and reporting cycle to three days across five subjects.

54 schools
Schools covered - Phase 1 (October 2025)
3000 students
Students assessed - Phase 1 (October 2025)
1000 schools (1,000+)
Schools covered - Phase 2 (April 2026)
70000 students (70,000+)
Students assessed - Phase 2 (April 2026)
300000 evaluations (300,000+)
Individual evaluations - Phase 2 (April 2026)
15 district blocks
District blocks covered (April 2026)
3 days
Grading and reporting turnaround time (April 2026)
Jodhpur's AI-Assisted Census Assessment — Grading 70,000 Students' Answer Sheets in Days

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Jodhpur District Administration & Rajasthan Education Department, with EdOptimize and Central Electronics Ltd (CEL)
Period
October 2025 – April 2026 (Phase 1–2)
Keywords
assessment, educational data, public education, AI-assisted grading

Context

Manual grading of subjective answer sheets across large public-school systems is slow, inconsistent between markers, and rarely produces topic-level diagnostic data for teachers. Jodhpur district, Rajasthan, piloted an AI-assisted alternative through its Competency-based Census Assessment and School Reporting Pilot Project, run by the district administration and Education Department with technology partners EdOptimize and Central Electronics Ltd (CEL).

Objectives

To speed up grading of subjective and objective answer sheets and give teachers topic-level competency breakdowns and remedial-intervention suggestions, rather than a single aggregate mark.

Activities

Phase 1 (October 2025) covered 54 schools and just over 3,000 students in classes VI-VIII. Phase 2 (April 2026) scaled to more than 1,000 schools across all 15 district blocks and over 70,000 students in classes VI-IX (300,000+ individual evaluations), covering English, Hindi, Mathematics, Science and Social Science in both Hindi- and English-medium schools. Teachers scan completed answer sheets with an AI-enabled application, which grades objective and subjective responses and produces a personalised report card scored 0-3 stars per topic within three days.

Results

Public reporting describes a reduction in grading and reporting turnaround from multiple weeks to three days, and scale-up from 54 schools/~3,000 students to 1,000+ schools/70,000+ students within about six months; however, no independent evaluation of grading accuracy against human markers or of downstream learning-outcome effects has been published.

Conclusions

The initiative is presented as a process-efficiency and diagnostic-reporting success at scale, but the underlying AI model, grading methodology, data-protection and bias-audit details remain undisclosed.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Jodhpur District Administration and Rajasthan Education Department programme leadership, Technology partners EdOptimize and Central Electronics Ltd (CEL) providing the AI-enabled grading application, Teachers who scan and submit completed answer sheets via the application

Conditions for success

  • A phased rollout (54-school pilot before scaling to 1,000+ schools) to test the AI grading application before district-wide deployment
  • Coverage of both Hindi- and English-medium schools across all subjects
  • Dashboards giving teachers topic-level competency data rather than a single aggregate score to support remedial teaching

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful