Top 74%
in this catalogue (719 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Transferability / replicability1/3
The combined-category quota design is legally replicable, but the same evidence that documents its failure argues against transferring this specific design, limiting its value as a positive replication template.
Impact on gender equality0/1
Peer-reviewed analysis shows women's Mazhilis representation declined from 27.4% to 17.6% after the quota's second application in 2023, indicating no positive impact on gender equality in practice.
Effectiveness0/1
The quota did not translate into increased women's representation; only 2 of the parties exceeded 30% women among elected deputies while the largest ruling party fell far short despite formal compliance.
Efficiency0/1
No cost/efficiency data applies to a legislative quota mechanism, and none was found in the sourced material.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
A peer-reviewed 2024 academic study provides quantified before/after representation figures and party-level breakdowns, a genuine independent evaluation rather than self-reported government activity.
Sustainability1/1
The quota law remains formally in force and has now been applied across two full electoral cycles (2021 and 2023).
Achievement / evidence0/1
The stated policy goal — increasing women's political representation — was not achieved; representation fell to its lowest level since 2005 despite the law being fully implemented and enforced.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding0/1
UN Women itself has publicly criticised the quota's combined-category design as insufficiently gender-specific, and has called for a dedicated women-only quota to replace it.
Curator validation1/1
The entry is built on a peer-reviewed academic source plus corroborating, independently domain-diverse UN Women and news sources, and honestly reports a negative outcome rather than presenting the law as a success.
Evidoria. Kazakhstan's Combined 30% Quota for Women, Youth & Persons with Disabilities on Party Lists — A Cautionary Case. Persistent ID: 3b317722-d4af-4973-a566-293705deafd7.