evidoria

What works in Kazakhstan

All catalogues

38
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
9%
strong evidence, of 33 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan has deployed several evidence-tested digital and financial innovations to improve public services and economic outcomes. The Digital Family Card automatically identifies and enrolls vulnerable families across 6+ million households using 120 wellbeing indicators from government data, while Damu Fund's market-aligned partial guarantees raised SME employment by ~24% and sales by ~21%—demonstrating that guarantee design outperforms interest-rate subsidies, which cut employment ~10%. Adildik Joly's AI-assisted procurement oversight recovered 244 million tenge in fines and flagged 20 billion tenge in high-risk purchases since 2021, and the Astana International Financial Centre has channelled $20 billion into the economy since 2018 by operating as an English common-law enclave.

Drawn from: Digital Family Card — Kazakhstan's Automatic, Data-Driven Safety Net for Vulnerable Families · Damu Fund's Market-Aligned Partial Guarantees — Kazakhstan's Evidence-Tested SME Credit Instrument · Adildik Joly's Red Flags Management — AI-Assisted Civil-Society Oversight of Public Procurement in Kazakhstan · Astana International Financial Centre — An English Common-Law Enclave for International Finance · Astana Hub — International Technopark of IT Start-ups · Closing the AI-Literacy Gap for Physics Teacher Trainees — A Nine-University Controlled Trial in Kazakhstan · Digital Analytics of Judicial Practice — Kazakhstan's AI Case-Outcome Tool, Scaled to Every Court · Orleu / UNESCO-IITE National Generative-AI Micro-Certification for Teachers (Kazakhstan)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Scalability beyond pilot +17 pts 79 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +13 pts 60 here · 47 average

Evidence of learning impact +10 pts 37 here · 26 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +9 pts 47 here · 38 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -8 pts 46 here · 54 average

Equity & inclusion -10 pts 40 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average

Inclusiveness / equity -14 pts 29 here · 43 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -15 pts 58 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Achievement / evidence -37 pts 50 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -39 pts 50 here · 89 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Scalability beyond pilot
79 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
60 · 47
Evidence of learning impact
37 · 26
Teacher capability & pedagogy
47 · 38
Evidence of impact / measured public value
65 · 57
Sustainability
82 · 78
Transferability / demonstrated replication
57 · 60
Innovation
59 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
42 · 48
Documented learning
67 · 74
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
46 · 54
Equity & inclusion
40 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 27
Inclusiveness / equity
29 · 43
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
58 · 74
Effectiveness
50 · 66
Curator validation
50 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 32
Achievement / evidence
50 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 89
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70

Coloured bar: Kazakhstan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital Family Card — Kazakhstan's Automatic, Data-Driven Safety Net for Vulnerable Families · 96

Damu Fund's Market-Aligned Partial Guarantees — Kazakhstan's Evidence-Tested SME Credit Instrument · 91

Adildik Joly's Red Flags Management — AI-Assisted Civil-Society Oversight of Public Procurement in Kazakhstan · 80

Astana International Financial Centre — An English Common-Law Enclave for International Finance · 76

Astana Hub — International Technopark of IT Start-ups · 76

Closing the AI-Literacy Gap for Physics Teacher Trainees — A Nine-University Controlled Trial in Kazakhstan · 73

Digital Analytics of Judicial Practice — Kazakhstan's AI Case-Outcome Tool, Scaled to Every Court · 73

Orleu / UNESCO-IITE National Generative-AI Micro-Certification for Teachers (Kazakhstan) · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Kazakhstan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more