evidoria

What works in Kazakhstan

All catalogues

27
evaluated practices
56/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Kazakhstan

Drawn from: Adildik Joly's Red Flags Management — AI-Assisted Civil-Society Oversight of Public Procurement in Kazakhstan · Astana Hub — International Technopark of IT Start-ups · Digital Analytics of Judicial Practice — Kazakhstan's AI Case-Outcome Tool, Scaled to Every Court · Orleu / UNESCO-IITE National Generative-AI Micro-Certification for Teachers (Kazakhstan) · Kazakhstan National AI in Education Standards 2025–2029 · Digital Family Card — Kazakhstan's AI-driven proactive social protection targeting · Invataxi App Integration — Kazakhstan's On-Demand Accessible Ride Service for Wheelchair Users · eGov.kz — Kazakhstan's National E-Government Portal and Mobile App

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +27 pts 78 here · 51 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Scalability beyond pilot +20 pts 83 here · 64 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +15 pts 52 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +10 pts 57 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -10 pts 55 here · 64 average

Innovation -10 pts 52 here · 63 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -20 pts 11 here · 31 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -22 pts 53 here · 76 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average

Inclusiveness / equity -29 pts 13 here · 42 average

Evaluated outcomes -34 pts 50 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -41 pts 50 here · 91 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
78 · 51
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Scalability beyond pilot
83 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
52 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
57 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Evidence of impact / measured public value
64 · 59
Sustainability
82 · 78
Equity & inclusion
52 · 52
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 59
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 50
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Transparency, fairness & accountability
46 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
55 · 64
Innovation
52 · 63
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
11 · 31
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
53 · 76
Documented learning
50 · 74
Curator validation
50 · 74
Effectiveness
50 · 77
Inclusiveness / equity
13 · 42
Evaluated outcomes
50 · 84
Achievement / evidence
50 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
50 · 91
Efficiency
0 · 44
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80

Coloured bar: Kazakhstan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Adildik Joly's Red Flags Management — AI-Assisted Civil-Society Oversight of Public Procurement in Kazakhstan · 80

Astana Hub — International Technopark of IT Start-ups · 76

Digital Analytics of Judicial Practice — Kazakhstan's AI Case-Outcome Tool, Scaled to Every Court · 73

Orleu / UNESCO-IITE National Generative-AI Micro-Certification for Teachers (Kazakhstan) · 73

Kazakhstan National AI in Education Standards 2025–2029 · 73

Digital Family Card — Kazakhstan's AI-driven proactive social protection targeting · 73

Invataxi App Integration — Kazakhstan's On-Demand Accessible Ride Service for Wheelchair Users · 72

eGov.kz — Kazakhstan's National E-Government Portal and Mobile App · 71

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Kazakhstan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more