evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Kiribati Digital Connectivity — East Micronesia Cable & Domestic Network Expansion

Kiribati · Tarawa · See the Kiribati profile

World Bank/ADB-financed submarine and domestic fibre links are cutting Kiribati's reliance on costly satellite bandwidth. Vodafone Kiribati reports 87% population coverage, but the Bank's own reports flag high prices and delays.

87 %
Population network coverage
95 %
Target population network coverage (within 18 months of latest update)
69,200 connections (~51% of population)
Mobile connections (early 2024)
73,300 users (~54% of population)
Internet users (early 2024)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Government of Kiribati
Period
2017-present
Keywords
broadband connectivity, submarine cable, rural/remote access, Pacific islands, digital infrastructure

Context

Kiribati — a nation of 33 atolls spread across 3.5 million km² of the central Pacific — historically depended on expensive satellite links for internet access. Since 2017, the World Bank's Kiribati Connectivity Project and the Asian Development Bank/Australian Infrastructure Financing Facility for the Pacific-backed East Micronesia Cable System (EMCS) have financed an international submarine cable connecting South Tarawa to Kosrae (Federated States of Micronesia) and Nauru, together with a domestic fibre network across Tarawa.

Activities

The EMCS's initial cable landing in Kiribati took place in December 2021, with the wider Micronesia-Kiribati-Nauru system reaching service readiness around 2025.

Results

Telecom operator Vodafone Kiribati reports 87% population network coverage as of its most recent public update, with a stated commitment to reach 95% within 18 months via new sites in the outer islands and South Tarawa. Independent market-data aggregation (DataReportal/Kepios) put Kiribati at roughly 69,200 mobile connections (about 51% of the population) and 73,300 internet users (about 54%) in early 2024. The World Bank's own Implementation Status & Results reporting is candid about the project's limits: it states that the cost of internet services has decreased and availability has increased, but that retail internet prices "remain high," reflecting continued reliance on satellite backhaul pending full fibre rollout, and it flags delays in the EMCS timeline as a persistent implementation risk.

Conclusions

This combination of hard infrastructure, transparent multilateral progress reporting, and an explicit, still-unmet universal-coverage target makes Kiribati a useful, honestly evidenced case of digital inclusion in a small, geographically extreme island state — success is real but partial and ongoing rather than a completed transformation.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful