A Bangladeshi government programme training youth nationwide, to sub-district level, in graphic design, digital marketing and web development for the freelance economy — turning educated but unemployed youth into income-earning digital freelancers rather than emigrating for work.
13000 laptops
Laptops distributed (early phase)
4000 laptops
Laptops distributed (later phase)
240000 trainees
Young women trained in ICT fundamentals
53,000-77,000 trainees
Cumulative youths trained since 2016 (range across sources)
32234 people
Trainees confirmed earning via freelancing platforms
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
ICT Division, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Government of Bangladesh
Period
2016–present
Keywords
IT/ITES skills training, freelancing & outsourcing, digital literacy, youth employment
Context
Launched on 12 December 2016 by the ICT Division, the Learning and Earning Development Project (LEDP) provides free, structured training in 'professional outsourcing' skills — principally graphic design, digital marketing and web design/development — delivered through training centres reaching all upazilas (sub-districts) and districts of Bangladesh. It explicitly targets educated but unemployed youth, including people with disabilities.
Objectives
To give Bangladeshi youth a way to earn foreign-currency income and build careers domestically through remote and freelance digital work, as an alternative to unemployment or labour migration abroad.
Activities
The programme has distributed laptops to trainees to remove equipment barriers (reported at roughly 13,000 in an early phase and 4,000 in a later one). A parallel track has delivered short two-day ICT-fundamentals training to 240,000 young women nationwide.
Results
Reported cumulative trainee totals vary across sources and reporting periods — figures range from roughly 53,000 to 77,000 youths trained across phases since 2016. One independent outlet reported that of those trained, 32,234 were confirmed to be actively earning through freelancing platforms, implying a conversion-to-income rate of roughly 40-60% depending on which total-trained figure is used as the denominator.
Conclusions
A widely circulated claim that LEDP-trained freelancers had generated '$5 billion' in combined income appears inconsistent with independently reported figures for Bangladesh's entire national freelance industry (roughly $500 million-$1 billion annually for the whole country), and is treated as an unverifiable outlier rather than repeated as fact. The programme's own detailed impact-assessment report could not be retrieved directly for this review.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No specific programme budget figure disclosed; scale indicated by laptop distribution (13,000 then 4,000 units) and training reaching all sub-districts nationwide.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Launched 12 December 2016; multiple funded phases since; ongoing as of latest reporting.
Staffing & skills
Delivered by the ICT Division, Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications and Information Technology, Government of Bangladesh, through training centres in every upazila and district
Removal of equipment barriers via laptop distribution to trainees
Explicit targeting of educated-but-unemployed youth and people with disabilities, plus a dedicated 240,000-strong track for young women
Common failure modes
Reported cumulative trainee totals are inconsistent across sources and phases (53,000-77,000), and a widely circulated '$5 billion' aggregate income claim appears inconsistent with independent estimates of Bangladesh's entire national freelance industry ($500m-$1bn/year), suggesting overstated impact claims circulate around the programme
The primary government impact-assessment report could not be retrieved, meaning figures rely on secondary press coverage
Where it fits
Governance type
single-ministry national government programme
Scale
national (all upazilas and districts)
Income level
lower-middle-income (Bangladesh)
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.