evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Liechtenstein's Ecological Compensation Payments — Two Decades of Tracked Farmland Habitat Growth

Liechtenstein · Vaduz · See the Liechtenstein profile · See the Vaduz profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 27% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Liechtenstein pays farmers under its Compensation Act to manage 'ecologically valuable' habitat -- meadows, hedges, wildflower strips -- that grew from 13.5% of farmland in 2000 to 16.9% in 2020, 654 hectares by 2024, alongside Alpine-grazing and organic-conversion payments.

13.5 % of agricultural land
Ecological compensation area, 2000 (2000)
16.9 % of agricultural land
Ecological compensation area, 2020 (2020)
654 hectares
Ecological compensation area, 2024 (2024)
43.3 % of registered farms (42 of 97)
Farms managed under organic guidelines, 2023 (2023)
2,455,804 CHF
Contribution for roughage-consuming livestock, 2023 (2023)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Government of Liechtenstein (Office for Environment / agricultural direct-payments scheme)
Period
2000–2024
Keywords
agri-environmental payments, biodiversity, alpine grazing, organic farming

Context

Liechtenstein is a 160 km² Alpine microstate where 42% of the national territory is forested, with elevation ranging from about 430m to over 2,600m supporting habitat gradients described as rare or unique at the European level.

Activities

Under the Act on Direct Subsidies and its ecological-incentives Ordinance (the 'Compensation Act'), the state pays farmers to manage designated 'ecological compensation areas' — extensively used meadows, litter meadows, hedgerows and wildflower strips — and to convert to certified organic production.

Results

Ecological compensation area rose from 13.5% of agricultural land in 2000 to 16.9% in 2020, already above an official benchmark of roughly 15%. By 2024 the area stood at 654 hectares, essentially flat on the previous year after averaging about +8.9 ha/year over 2014-2023, suggesting the expansion phase is levelling off near the policy target.

Conclusions

The scheme closely mirrors Switzerland's longer-running federal ecological-compensation model; it is a slow, incremental land-use programme rather than a dramatic restoration story, and its continuation depends on national direct-payment budgets rather than market-based ecosystem-service buyers.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Government of Liechtenstein, Office for Environment

Conditions for success

  • Formal national law (Compensation Act and Ordinance) with annual official statistics
  • Close alignment with Switzerland's established federal model via customs/economic union

Common failure modes

  • No separate data on carbon or water/soil outcomes specific to the scheme

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful