Top 27%
in this catalogue (918 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced1/3
Extensively managed meadows and hedgerows carry a plausible carbon co-benefit, but no project-specific carbon accounting was located for this scheme.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced3/3
Two decades of official national statistics (Statistikportal.li) quantify the area and habitat-type breakdown of ecological compensation land (13.5% of farmland in 2000 to 16.9% in 2020; 654 ha in 2024), a strong, verifiable evidence base for biodiversity-oriented land-use change.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control1/3
Extensive meadows, hedges and wildflower strips plausibly support soil and water retention, but the scheme's own metrics track habitat area, not soil or hydrological outcomes.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
No evidence found that the scheme addresses fire risk; not applicable to this Alpine agricultural context in the sources reviewed.
Governance, certification & transferability3/3
A formal national law (the Compensation Act and Ordinance) with annual official statistics, over two decades of continuity, and close alignment with Switzerland's established federal model, indicating strong, transferable governance.
Evidoria. Liechtenstein's Ecological Compensation Payments — Two Decades of Tracked Farmland Habitat Growth. Persistent ID: df6a630f-61ba-4e60-9f40-aab9cab7f8c0.