evidoria

What works in Liechtenstein

All catalogues

4
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 3 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Liechtenstein

Drawn from: Verein für Menschenrechte (VMR): Liechtenstein's Independent Gender-Equality Ombudsman · Fobizz National Licence — Liechtenstein Extends Its AI-Assisted Teaching Platform to Every School · TVTG — Liechtenstein's Blockchain Act and Its Narrowing Path to MiCAR · LiBot — Liechtenstein's National AI Chatbot for Public Administration

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +63 pts 100 here · 37 average

Innovation +37 pts 100 here · 63 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +14 pts 67 here · 52 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Scalability & sustainability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Sustainability -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Transferability / replicability -26 pts 33 here · 59 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -31 pts 33 here · 64 average

Inclusiveness / equity -42 pts 0 here · 42 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 37
Innovation
100 · 63
Curator validation
100 · 74
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 52
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Scalability & sustainability
56 · 64
Sustainability
67 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 59
Transferability / replicability
33 · 59
Governance, capability & sustainability
33 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
0 · 42
Efficiency
0 · 44
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
0 · 76
Effectiveness
0 · 77

Coloured bar: Liechtenstein. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Verein für Menschenrechte (VMR): Liechtenstein's Independent Gender-Equality Ombudsman · 70

Fobizz National Licence — Liechtenstein Extends Its AI-Assisted Teaching Platform to Every School · 67

TVTG — Liechtenstein's Blockchain Act and Its Narrowing Path to MiCAR · 38

LiBot — Liechtenstein's National AI Chatbot for Public Administration · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Liechtenstein concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more