evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP) — India's Women Farmers' Empowerment Programme

India · New Delhi · See the India profile · See the New Delhi profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 55% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

India's DAY-NRLM sub-scheme has sanctioned 84 projects across 24 states, targeting 3 million+ women farmers. A Nielsen study found 1.3x higher agricultural income in participant households — but funding fell from Rs 65.6cr (2018-19) to Rs 1.85cr (2021-22).

84
Projects sanctioned (by 2019)
24
States covered (by 2019)
238 of 273 targeted
Districts covered (by 2019)
3.38-3.6 million
Women farmers covered (2019)
1.3x higher
Agricultural income, intervention vs control households
2.5x higher
Livestock income, intervention vs control households
59%
Adoption of agro-ecological practices in treatment villages
43%
Sanctioned funds released, one project (by October 2017)
Rs 65.60 crore
Central MKSP fund release (2018-19)
Rs 11.58 crore
Central MKSP fund release (2019-20)
Rs 11.20 crore
Central MKSP fund release (2020-21)
Rs 1.85 crore
Central MKSP fund release (2021-22)

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India (under DAY-NRLM)
Period
2011–present
Keywords
agriculture, rural livelihoods, women's economic empowerment

Context

Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP) has run since 2011 as a sub-component of India's Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM), aiming to strengthen women's participation and productivity in agriculture by organising women farmers into collectives, building technical capacity, and improving access to inputs, credit and markets. It is implemented through State Rural Livelihoods Missions, jointly funded by central and state governments (60:40, with more generous ratios for north-eastern and Himalayan states).

Objectives

The programme aims to organise women farmers into collectives and improve their technical capacity, access to inputs, credit and markets, so as to raise their agricultural productivity and income.

Activities

By 2019, the Ministry of Rural Development reported 84 projects sanctioned across 24 states and 238 of a targeted 273 districts, covering between 3.38 million and 3.6 million women farmers depending on the reporting year and metric used.

Results

A Nielsen study cited across 8 states (Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Assam and one other) found agricultural income 1.3 times higher and livestock income 2.5 times higher in intervention households than in control households, with 59% adoption of agro-ecological practices in treatment villages.

Conclusions

The programme is also a documented cautionary case: independent reporting by India Development Review found only 43% of one project's sanctioned funds had been released by October 2017, and central releases for MKSP fell sharply from Rs 65.60 crore (2018-19) to Rs 11.58 crore (2019-20), Rs 11.20 crore (2020-21) and just Rs 1.85 crore (2021-22) -- a funding collapse linked by independent commentators to stalled expansion, alongside field research noting farm assets and registrations often remain in male relatives' names despite women doing the labour.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Implemented through State Rural Livelihoods Missions, Central-state joint funding (60:40, more generous for NE/Himalayan states)

Conditions for success

  • Sustained central fund release to State Rural Livelihoods Missions
  • Women's collectives (SHG-based) with technical capacity-building

Common failure modes

  • Central fund releases collapsed from Rs 65.60 crore (2018-19) to Rs 1.85 crore (2021-22)
  • Farm assets and registrations often remain in male relatives' names despite women doing the labour

Where it fits

Governance type
federal, state-implemented central scheme
Scale
national (24 states)
Income level
lower-middle income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful