South Africa's Draft National AI Policy — Withdrawn After AI-Hallucinated Citations Exposed a Drafting Scandal
South Africa
South Africa published its draft National AI Policy for public comment on 10 April 2026, then withdrew it 16 days …
Malta · Birkirkara · See the Malta profile
Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 97% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
In 2019 Malta's MDIA launched what it called the world's first national AI certification scheme. An academic review found zero applications by 2021, and even after a 2024 legal overhaul made it 'fully operational,' MDIA still publishes no uptake or certification statistics.
In October 2019 the Malta Digital Innovation Authority (MDIA) launched the AI Innovative Technology Arrangement (AI ITA) scheme, describing it as the world's first national AI certification programme. Under the scheme, developers and deployers could have AI systems certified by an MDIA-licensed 'systems auditor' as meeting pre-set ethical, transparency and technical criteria — a voluntary conformity-assessment model that anticipated elements later formalised in the EU AI Act.
To provide a voluntary national AI certification and assurance pathway ahead of binding EU-level regulation.
MDIA subsequently issued Technology Assurance Sandbox programme guidelines (2021) and blueprint guidelines (2022), and opened a public consultation on an ITAS Sandbox in 2024. Subsidiary Legislation 591.01 (the ITAS Certification Regulations) entered into force on 14 June 2024, making the certification framework 'fully operational' under Malta's regulatory tracker. MDIA is now developing a further Technology Assurance Assessment Framework, with consultations planned through 2025.
An independent academic assessment of AI certification schemes found that, as of 2021, no application had yet been submitted under the scheme — two years after launch, the flagship programme had attracted no real-world adopters. As of the most recent public documentation, no statistics on the number of certifications issued, sandbox participants, or applications under the revised regime have been published.
This is included as a cautionary case: a well-publicised, carefully designed voluntary AI-assurance regime that, five years on, still shows no confirmed public evidence of real-world adoption. It illustrates a general risk for other jurisdictions building similar voluntary certification schemes — legal architecture alone, without a market mandate, incentive, or transparency requirement on uptake, may not translate into actual use.
Digital Europe Programme National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
South Africa
South Africa published its draft National AI Policy for public comment on 10 April 2026, then withdrew it 16 days …
Netherlands
The Netherlands Court of Audit audited 9 government algorithms in 2022, finding only 3 met basic requirements, then made algorithm …
Spain
Banco de España's Spain-STING model nowcasts quarterly Spanish GDP growth in real time from early indicators; a 2024 respecification (contemporaneous …
Netherlands
The Netherlands piloted its Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment on 15 government algorithms in 2023-24, testing whether agencies can …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.