evidoria

What works in Malta

All catalogues

39
evaluated practices
43/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 35 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Malta

Drawn from: MCA-FITA Web Accessibility Monitoring — Malta's In-Depth Reviews Average Just 50% · Cross-Referencing Every Taxpayer — Malta's SAS-Powered AI Push Against VAT and Tax Evasion · BeSmartOnline! · Start in Malta — Malta Enterprise's integrated startup finance and talent-attraction programme · TAKEOFF Seed Fund Award — Msida's Multi-Agency Seed Grants for Student and Researcher Start-Ups · ASTRA — the EU-Funded AI Project That Triples Air-Traffic Hotspot Warning Time to an Hour · Empower Platform Malta · Malta Nomad Residence Permit

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +20 pts 87 here · 66 average

Sustainability +12 pts 90 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion +9 pts 58 here · 50 average

Weaknesses

Innovation level -8 pts 53 here · 62 average

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -13 pts 44 here · 57 average

Scalability -14 pts 48 here · 62 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Curator validation -22 pts 51 here · 73 average

Evaluation evidence -24 pts 25 here · 49 average

Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence -27 pts 60 here · 87 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Impact on gender equality -53 pts 17 here · 70 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
87 · 66
Sustainability
90 · 78
Equity & inclusion
58 · 50
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
56 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Teacher capability & pedagogy
42 · 38
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 47
Transferability / replicability
55 · 60
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
83 · 89
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Transparency, fairness & accountability
48 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Innovation level
53 · 62
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evidence of impact / measured results
44 · 57
Scalability
48 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Curator validation
51 · 73
Evaluation evidence
25 · 49
Documented learning
50 · 74
Achievement / evidence
60 · 87
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Efficiency
0 · 32
Impact on gender equality
17 · 70
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Malta. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

MCA-FITA Web Accessibility Monitoring — Malta's In-Depth Reviews Average Just 50% · 88

Cross-Referencing Every Taxpayer — Malta's SAS-Powered AI Push Against VAT and Tax Evasion · 80

BeSmartOnline! · 76

Start in Malta — Malta Enterprise's integrated startup finance and talent-attraction programme · 71

TAKEOFF Seed Fund Award — Msida's Multi-Agency Seed Grants for Student and Researcher Start-Ups · 62

ASTRA — the EU-Funded AI Project That Triples Air-Traffic Hotspot Warning Time to an Hour · 60

Empower Platform Malta · 58

Malta Nomad Residence Permit · 57

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Malta concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more