evidoria

What works in Malta

All catalogues

33
evaluated practices
40/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 30 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Malta

Malta has deployed AI-powered tax enforcement tools that collected €650 million in additional tax revenue in 2024, demonstrating significant fiscal capacity, while simultaneously attracting tech talent through integrated startup programmes that have funded 66 projects with €30 million and supported over 300 tech startups offering average wages of €45,000—double the national average. The country has also implemented digital residence pathways for remote workers, with the Nomad Residence Permit growing to 1,031 applications in 2024 alone. Beyond economic initiatives, Malta operates multi-stakeholder programmes addressing digital safety and gender equality, though these show descriptive rather than quantified outcomes.

Drawn from: Cross-Referencing Every Taxpayer — Malta's SAS-Powered AI Push Against VAT and Tax Evasion · BeSmartOnline! · Start in Malta — Malta Enterprise's integrated startup finance and talent-attraction programme · Empower Platform Malta · Malta Nomad Residence Permit · Women 4IT · StarKids · Malta's National Guidelines on the Ethical Use of AI and Data in Teaching and Learning

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Sustainability +10 pts 88 here · 78 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Scalability -12 pts 51 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -14 pts 44 here · 59 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -15 pts 39 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -16 pts 75 here · 91 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 42 average

Curator validation -23 pts 51 here · 74 average

Achievement / evidence -24 pts 67 here · 91 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Documented learning -41 pts 33 here · 74 average

Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average

Impact on gender equality -55 pts 25 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

Score profile vs peers

Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Sustainability
88 · 78
Equity & inclusion
58 · 52
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
56 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Teacher capability & pedagogy
42 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 48
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Innovation level
62 · 63
Transferability / replicability
54 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Scalability
51 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured results
44 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
39 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
75 · 91
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 42
Curator validation
51 · 74
Achievement / evidence
67 · 91
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Documented learning
33 · 74
Evaluation evidence
0 · 45
Impact on gender equality
25 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Malta. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Cross-Referencing Every Taxpayer — Malta's SAS-Powered AI Push Against VAT and Tax Evasion · 80

BeSmartOnline! · 76

Start in Malta — Malta Enterprise's integrated startup finance and talent-attraction programme · 71

Empower Platform Malta · 58

Malta Nomad Residence Permit · 57

Women 4IT · 56

StarKids · 56

Malta's National Guidelines on the Ethical Use of AI and Data in Teaching and Learning · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Malta concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more