evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Management of Floodplains on the Tisza — LIFE-Nature Restoration Programme (Hungary)

Hungary · Szolnok · See the Hungary profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A 2001-2005 EU LIFE-Nature project paid Tisza-valley farmers near Szolnok, Hungary to graze traditional cattle on restored wet meadows, reconnecting gravel pits and reviving beaver and fish habitat - though key hydrological works stalled after a 2004 permitting reorganisation.

5 of 5 designated sub-sites
Restoration sub-sites where grazing management was established
Management of Floodplains on the Tisza — LIFE-Nature Restoration Programme (Hungary)

Details

Promoter
WWF Austria & WWF Hungary
Period
2001-2005
Region (NUTS)
HU32
Keywords
floodplain restoration, wetland rewetting, grazing management, biodiversity

Context

Between 2001 and 2005, WWF Austria and WWF Hungary ran a €217,663 EU LIFE-Nature project ("Management of Floodplains on the Tisza", LIFE00 NAT/A/007051) across five sub-sites of the middle Tisza River near Szolnok, Hungary. The project reconnected old gravel pits to the river's flood regime, converted drained arable land back to wet meadow, and paid local farmers through grazing-based land-use agreements using traditional Hungarian grey cattle as an alternative income source to intensive cropping.

Results

Verified outcomes include a successful beaver reintroduction, clay-pit restoration near Nagykörű that improved conditions for native fish spawning, and the establishment of grazing management across all five designated sub-sites. However, according to the EU's own project record, several planned actions were not completed: hydrological restoration at Tiszajenő, a permit for hybrid-poplar removal at Tiszakürt, and formal legal protection of the Kötelek sub-site all stalled after Hungary's nature-protection authority was reorganised in 2004, shifting permitting from regional park directorates to a centralised Budapest agency. Independent reporting on continuing restoration work near the same Nagykörű site (under the EU-funded MERLIN programme) confirms large-river restoration in the Tisza valley remains slow going two decades on.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — €217,663 total EU LIFE-Nature co-financing (2001–2005).
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Five-year fixed-term project (2001–2005); follow-on floodplain restoration work near the same site continues today under the separately funded EU MERLIN programme.
Staffing & skills
WWF Austria & WWF Hungary (implementers), local farmers (grazing-based land-use agreements), regional park directorates (permitting, pre-2004)

Conditions for success

  • Stable, accessible permitting authority — regional park directorates handled permitting until a 2004 reorganisation shifted it to a centralised Budapest agency, which stalled several planned actions
  • Farmer willingness to adopt grazing-based land use over intensive cropping

Common failure modes

  • Hydrological restoration at Tiszajenő, a hybrid-poplar removal permit at Tiszakürt, and formal legal protection of the Kötelek sub-site all stalled after the 2004 permitting reorganisation
  • A fixed five-year project timeline was too short to complete a shift away from cash-crop farming toward flood-compatible land use, per independent reporting two decades later

Commonly funded by

LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful