evidoria

What works in Hungary

All catalogues

30
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 27 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Hungary

Hungary demonstrates significant innovation and institutional capacity across multiple sectors. Hungary's real-time invoice reporting system has achieved the EU's best VAT compliance gap, falling from 21.7% (2013) to 2.3% (2022), while AI-assisted mammography screening detected 7% more breast cancers across 25,065 women with minimal additional recalls. The EIT Community Hub Budapest has supported 183 Hungarian startups, attracting €24m+ in investment and launching 23 products to market between 2021–2024. These practices span tax administration, healthcare, and entrepreneurship, though the evidence does not quantify broader impacts on employment, gender equality, or digital inclusion beyond these specific initiatives.

Drawn from: The Visegrad Women’s Initiative · Mia AI-Assisted Mammography Screening — Hungary's National Breast-Screening Programme Adds an AI 'Third Reader' · EIT Community Hub Budapest — multi-sector innovation accelerator for Central and Eastern Europe · NAV Online Számla — Hungary's real-time invoice reporting and AI-assisted VAT fraud detection · ICT teacher training for working with disabled participants · Programme for helping adult and senior citizens of marginalized rural areas in developing their digital competences and ICT skills. · AI Adaptive Programming Tutor Nearly Doubles Learning Gains for Disadvantaged Students — University of Dunaújváros · InfoPark Budapest

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Evidence of learning impact +39 pts 67 here · 28 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Curator validation +16 pts 90 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +13 pts 50 here · 37 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -9 pts 44 here · 54 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -22 pts 25 here · 48 average

Inclusiveness / equity -29 pts 13 here · 42 average

Demonstrated reach -31 pts 44 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Evidence of learning impact
67 · 28
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Curator validation
90 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 37
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Sustainability
85 · 78
Equity & inclusion
58 · 52
Evidence of impact / measured results
62 · 59
Scalability
64 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 51
Transferability / replicability
58 · 60
Innovation level
60 · 63
Governance, certification & transferability
60 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Documented learning
67 · 74
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
44 · 54
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Transparency, ethics & data protection
25 · 48
Inclusiveness / equity
13 · 42
Demonstrated reach
44 · 76
Evaluation evidence
0 · 45

Coloured bar: Hungary. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

The Visegrad Women’s Initiative · 93

Mia AI-Assisted Mammography Screening — Hungary's National Breast-Screening Programme Adds an AI 'Third Reader' · 87

EIT Community Hub Budapest — multi-sector innovation accelerator for Central and Eastern Europe · 76

NAV Online Számla — Hungary's real-time invoice reporting and AI-assisted VAT fraud detection · 73

ICT teacher training for working with disabled participants · 72

Programme for helping adult and senior citizens of marginalized rural areas in developing their digital competences and ICT skills. · 72

AI Adaptive Programming Tutor Nearly Doubles Learning Gains for Disadvantaged Students — University of Dunaújváros · 67

InfoPark Budapest · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Hungary concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more