evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

National Pension Childbirth Credit — South Korea's Gender-Neutral Design That Mostly Benefits Men

South Korea · Jeonju · See the South Korea profile

Top 83% 37/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

South Korea's pension credit for childbirth was meant to offset caregiving time lost to child-rearing, but official 2025 data show 97.3% of recipients are men versus 2.7% women — a cautionary case of a gender-neutral eligibility rule producing a starkly gender-unequal outcome.

National Pension Childbirth Credit — South Korea's Gender-Neutral Design That Mostly Benefits Men

Details

Promoter
National Pension Service (NPS), Republic of Korea
Period
2008–present (credit introduced); expanded January 2026
Keywords
pensions, social security, gender equality, family policy

Description

South Korea's National Pension Service grants "childbirth credits" — extra months added to a contributor's recorded insured period — intended to offset time typically lost to child-rearing and boost the eventual pension of the parent who provided that care, addressing one driver of Korea's large gender pension gap (women's average National Old Age Pension payment was 53% of men's in 2025, a 47% gap).
Introduced in 2008, the credit initially applied from a family's second child onward. From 1 January 2026, eligibility was expanded to the first child (12 months), second child (12 months) and third child onward (18 months each), with the previous 50-month cap abolished. Critically, the credit is gender-neutral by design: either parent can claim it, and when both parents are subscribers, allocation rules can favour whichever parent has the stronger contribution record — disproportionately the father, since men in Korea earn on average 46% more than women.
Official National Pension Service data reported by Korea JoongAng Daily show that, as of end-2025, men received 9,727 of the childbirth credits (97.3%) versus 272 for women (2.7%) — despite women remaining the overwhelming majority of children's primary caregivers, the group the credit was meant to support. Reporting attributes this to credits being applied at retirement rather than at childbirth, a 10-year minimum contribution-history requirement that mothers with career interruptions struggle to meet, and default allocation rules favouring the higher earner. A September 2026 Human Rights Watch report on systemic gender and age discrimination in Korea's labour market situates this pension outcome within a broader pattern of structural disadvantage for women workers.
Honest caveat — this is included as a cautionary case. Despite good intentions and sizeable public expenditure (with government co-financing around 30% of cost), the January 2026 expansion increased the credit's generosity without changing the gender-neutral allocation rule that causes the skew. Reporting cites experts calling for crediting contributions at childbirth rather than retirement and for increased government funding; these fixes were not yet enacted as of this review.

Read the full analysis: https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/korea/men-receive-97-percent-of-koreas-childbirth-pension-credits-even-as-reforms-expand/12828683

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful