evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Netherlands' National Wildlife Crossing Network — Meerjarenprogramma Ontsnippering (MJPO)

Netherlands · Hilversum · See the Netherlands profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 58% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The Netherlands' MJPO programme resolved 166 of 176 ecological barriers by 2018, building a network of 2,100+ road and rail wildlife crossings; an independent study found ecoducts reach 62% target-species use and cut roadkill 83% where fenced.

166 of 176 barriers
Ecological barriers fully or partially resolved (2005-2018)
2,100+ crossings
Dedicated wildlife crossings on the road network (as of 2017)
62 %
Target-species use of ecoducts (study period)
83 %
Reduction in large-mammal roadkill at fenced crossings (study period)
1,734 T-EQA
Threat-weighted ecological quality gained (2005-2018)
283 million EUR
Total programme cost (2005-2018)
Netherlands' National Wildlife Crossing Network — Meerjarenprogramma Ontsnippering (MJPO)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Rijkswaterstaat & ProRail, with Wageningen Environmental Research
Period
2005–2018 (national programme; earliest structures from 1974)
Keywords
transport infrastructure, biodiversity connectivity, roads and rail, nature-inclusive engineering

Context

Starting with badger tunnels built in 1974 and the first large green bridges over the A50 motorway in 1988, the Netherlands built one of the world's most extensive wildlife-crossing networks under Rijkswaterstaat and ProRail, the national roads and rail agencies. The Multi-Year Programme for Defragmentation (MJPO), run 2005-2018, targeted 176 official ecological barriers where roads, railways and waterways cut through the National Ecological Network.

Activities

The programme built ecoducts, eco-culverts, wildlife underpasses, tree-crown-level overpasses and adapted bridges across the national road, rail and waterway network.

Results

By the end of 2018, 126 barriers were fully removed and 40 more partially addressed; the country's road network now carries more than 2,100 dedicated wildlife crossings. A peer-reviewed evaluation (van der Grift et al., Landscape Ecology, 2020) found that about 62% of target species use ecoducts as intended and that fenced crossing structures cut large-mammal roadkill by roughly 83%. The programme raised an estimated 1,734 T-EQA of threat-weighted ecological quality at a total cost of about EUR 283 million.

Conclusions

The same study found ecoducts to be the most expensive mitigation type per unit of ecological gain - large fauna tunnels and shared-use viaducts were more cost-effective, and buying and restoring agricultural land outperformed building new crossings on pure cost-effectiveness grounds. Researchers and the Dutch government treat this as an argument for mixing cheaper measures with ecoducts rather than a case against the network, which remains a reference model cited across Europe.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — Approximately EUR 283 million total programme cost (2005-2018), per van der Grift et al. 2020.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Earliest structures (badger tunnels) built 1974; first large green bridges 1988; national MJPO programme ran 2005-2018; a further 28 barriers planned post-2018, 22 deemed infeasible.
Staffing & skills
Rijkswaterstaat (national roads agency) and ProRail (national rail agency) jointly implemented the programme, Wageningen Environmental Research conducted ecological monitoring and evaluation

Conditions for success

  • National multi-year statutory programme (MJPO) with a defined target list of 176 official ecological barriers
  • Fencing paired with crossing structures to channel wildlife and cut roadkill
  • Independent peer-reviewed cost-effectiveness evaluation feeding back into future measure selection

Common failure modes

  • Ecoducts are the most expensive mitigation type per unit of ecological gain; large fauna tunnels and shared-use viaducts were more cost-effective
  • Buying and restoring agricultural land outperformed new crossing construction on pure cost-effectiveness grounds
  • 22 of the original 176 barriers were ultimately deemed infeasible to address

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful