What works in Netherlands
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Netherlands
The Netherlands demonstrates mixed capacity in public-sector algorithm oversight and digital accessibility enforcement, alongside emerging e-health innovation. The Court of Audit's recurring algorithm audits found that only 3 of 9 government algorithms met all basic requirements, with six showing gaps in governance, bias controls, and data security. The Dutch regulator ACM acknowledged a "very big gap" between industry status and EU Accessibility Act compliance when enforcement began in June 2025. In healthcare, an e-health platform for motor neuron disease achieved 86 of 90 patient enrollments and 88% sustained-use intent, but only 7 of 9 care teams maintained it post-pilot, chiefly due to lack of electronic health record integration. The practices do not quantify overall adoption rates or outcomes across the health system or regulatory landscape.
Drawn from: The Netherlands Court of Audit's Recurring Algorithm Audits — a Government Oversight Model for Public-Sector AI · ACM's Phased Crackdown on Inaccessible E-Commerce Under the European Accessibility Act · ALS Thuismeten & Coachen — Nationwide E-Health Home-Monitoring for Motor Neuron Disease · Ik Onderzoek Mee — Radboudumc's Co-Designed Health Monitor for People with Low Literacy or Mild Intellectual Disability · Netherlands' Digitoegankelijk Dashboard — A Public Accessibility-Declaration Monitor and 'Forgotten Channels' Sweep · International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · Amsterdam Impact · Direct Duidelijk — The Netherlands' Government-Wide Plain-Language Writing Coach Programme
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Effectiveness +21 pts 88 here · 66 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +12 pts 65 here · 54 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +11 pts 58 here · 47 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +8 pts 82 here · 74 average
Achievement / evidence +8 pts 95 here · 87 average
Weaknesses
Evaluated outcomes -9 pts 69 here · 78 average
Demonstrated reach -11 pts 65 here · 76 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -16 pts 11 here · 27 average
Equity & inclusion -29 pts 21 here · 50 average
Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Netherlands. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
ACM's Phased Crackdown on Inaccessible E-Commerce Under the European Accessibility Act · 92
ALS Thuismeten & Coachen — Nationwide E-Health Home-Monitoring for Motor Neuron Disease · 92
International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · 91
Amsterdam Impact · 91
Direct Duidelijk — The Netherlands' Government-Wide Plain-Language Writing Coach Programme · 88
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Netherlands concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more