evidoria

What works in Netherlands

All catalogues

89
evaluated practices
60/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 80 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Netherlands

The Netherlands has implemented several evidence-based oversight and accessibility practices. The Court of Audit's recurring algorithm audits found that only 3 of 9 government algorithms met basic requirements in 2022, revealing gaps in governance and data quality across public sector AI systems. The Digitoegankelijk Dashboard tracks digital accessibility compliance, with a 2023 sweep adding 5,291 previously untracked government channels and revealing that only 39% of tracked sites actually complied with accessibility law. Radboudumc's co-designed health monitor demonstrates inclusive research practices, reaching 412–296 respondents with low literacy or mild intellectual disabilities across three survey rounds, with 47% completing with personal support.

Drawn from: The Netherlands Court of Audit's Recurring Algorithm Audits — a Government Oversight Model for Public-Sector AI · Ik Onderzoek Mee — Radboudumc's Co-Designed Health Monitor for People with Low Literacy or Mild Intellectual Disability · Netherlands' Digitoegankelijk Dashboard — A Public Accessibility-Declaration Monitor and 'Forgotten Channels' Sweep · International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · Amsterdam Impact · Direct Duidelijk — The Netherlands' Government-Wide Plain-Language Writing Coach Programme · FRAIA — the Netherlands' Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment, Piloted Across 15 Government Algorithms · DFROG — De Nederlandsche Bank's Machine-Learning-Tested Nowcasting Model for GDP Growth

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Inclusiveness / equity +18 pts 61 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +18 pts 94 here · 76 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +16 pts 70 here · 54 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +14 pts 61 here · 48 average

Innovation level +12 pts 75 here · 63 average

Sustainability +11 pts 90 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Impact on gender equality +9 pts 89 here · 80 average

Weaknesses

Curator validation -8 pts 66 here · 74 average

Evidence of learning impact -11 pts 17 here · 28 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -21 pts 10 here · 31 average

Equity & inclusion -30 pts 22 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Effectiveness
100 · 77
Inclusiveness / equity
61 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
94 · 76
Transparency, fairness & accountability
70 · 54
Transparency, ethics & data protection
61 · 48
Innovation level
75 · 63
Sustainability
90 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Impact on gender equality
89 · 80
Governance, capability & sustainability
72 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
57 · 50
Scalability
68 · 64
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
94 · 91
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
52 · 51
Evidence of impact / measured results
58 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Documented learning
69 · 74
Evaluation evidence
38 · 45
Demonstrated reach
69 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Evaluated outcomes
77 · 85
Curator validation
66 · 74
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 28
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
10 · 31
Equity & inclusion
22 · 52

Coloured bar: Netherlands. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

The Netherlands Court of Audit's Recurring Algorithm Audits — a Government Oversight Model for Public-Sector AI · 93

ALS Thuismeten & Coachen — Nationwide E-Health Home-Monitoring for Motor Neuron Disease · 92

Ik Onderzoek Mee — Radboudumc's Co-Designed Health Monitor for People with Low Literacy or Mild Intellectual Disability · 92

Netherlands' Digitoegankelijk Dashboard — A Public Accessibility-Declaration Monitor and 'Forgotten Channels' Sweep · 92

International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · 91

Amsterdam Impact · 91

Direct Duidelijk — The Netherlands' Government-Wide Plain-Language Writing Coach Programme · 88

FRAIA — the Netherlands' Fundamental Rights and Algorithms Impact Assessment, Piloted Across 15 Government Algorithms · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Netherlands concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Women in Business in Bulgaria · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Girl Power - Denmark · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

With Purpose - Startup School · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more