evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

New Mexico's Amira Opt-Out — A Statewide Biometric-Privacy Backlash Against a Mandatory AI Reading Test

United States of America · Santa Fe · See the United States of America profile

Top 82% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

New Mexico mandates Amira's AI voice-based reading test for all K-2 students, but after parents raised biometric-privacy concerns, six districts including Santa Fe and Los Alamos opted out and the state introduced tiered voice-data-deletion rules.

New Mexico's Amira Opt-Out — A Statewide Biometric-Privacy Backlash Against a Mandatory AI Reading Test

Details

Promoter
New Mexico Public Education Department / Amira Learning
Period
2025–2026
Keywords
K-12 education, reading assessment, biometric data privacy, ed-tech procurement

Description

New Mexico's Public Education Department (PED) requires all kindergarten-through-second-grade students statewide to take Amira Learning's AI reading assessment three times a year, plus 30+ minutes of weekly AI-guided tutoring, at an annual state cost of $2.7 million ($1.4 million for the assessment component alone).
Amira listens to children read aloud and analyses the recording to flag errors. Leaders in Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Farmington, Roswell, Clayton and Turquoise Trail Charter School argued that a child's voice is biometric data and objected to a third-party vendor retaining recordings that could be used to train commercial AI models, as well as to documented accuracy gaps for students with speech disabilities or accents.
Days before the 2025-26 school year, PED responded with an opt-out policy: districts can use Amira without the voice-recording feature, revert to paper-based testing, or choose an alternative assessment, and can request deletion of voice recordings daily, weekly, monthly or at year-end instead of the prior default schedule.
A May 2026 Legislative Education Study Committee brief found New Mexico still lacks statewide AI-procurement standards, AI-specific student data-privacy rules, or a formal evaluation process for education AI tools — meaning the opt-out resolved this one case without closing the underlying governance gap.

Read the full analysis: https://www.abqjournal.com/news/santa-fe-and-los-alamos-school-districts-will-not-use-required-ai-reading-software-over-student-privacy-concerns/3095107

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful