evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

New York City Participatory Budgeting — Council Discretionary Funds Put to Resident Vote, With Measured Voting Effects

United States of America · New York · See the United States of America profile · See the New York profile

Top 50% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

NYC council members let residents vote on capital projects from discretionary funds; a 2023 voter-file study found PB raised individual voting probability by 8.4 percentage points, with larger effects among low-propensity voters.

New York City Participatory Budgeting — Council Discretionary Funds Put to Resident Vote, With Measured Voting Effects

Details

Promoter
New York City Council / Participatory Budgeting Project
Period
2011–present
Keywords
participatory budgeting, civic engagement, council discretionary funds

Description

Participatory budgeting in New York City began as a council-member-led pilot and expanded across districts, with residents brainstorming ideas, delegates developing proposals and residents voting on which are funded from council discretionary capital funds.
A 2015 report noted more than 6,000 New Yorkers brainstormed ideas and more than 50,000 turned out to vote. Early evaluation work by the Community Development Project (Urban Justice Center) reported that PB drew women, people of color and lower-income voters, with 72% of voters new to PB; an OIDP summary of a research report gives somewhat different shares, so demographic claims should be checked against the original report.
A 2023 Political Behavior study linked PB participants to state voter files and compared them with similar voters in non-PB districts, finding PB engagement increased individual probability of voting by an average of 8.4 percentage points, with larger effects for younger, lower-educated, lower-income and Black voters. A separate equity analysis found only some demographic groups predicted PB voting by district.
Limitation: continuity depends on council members opting in, and we found no source confirming current funding levels.

Read the full analysis: https://researchers.kean.edu/en/publications/testing-the-participation-hypothesis-evidence-from-participatory-/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful