evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

NICRO's Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence (PIPV) Programme — South Africa's Court-Referred Behaviour-Change Groups for Men

South Africa · Cape Town · See the South Africa profile · See the Cape Town profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 46% 70/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

NICRO's PIPV programme is a 20-week, court-referred group programme for South African men who used intimate-partner violence, pairing cognitive-behavioural work on power and control with partner support groups; a 2017 study found participants reported stopping physical violence.

8 of 8 participants
Interviewed programme completers reporting they had stopped physical violence (2017 study)
NICRO's Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence (PIPV) Programme — South Africa's Court-Referred Behaviour-Change Groups for Men

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
NICRO (National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders)
Period
Programme ongoing (NICRO est. 1910); evaluation study published 2017
Keywords
criminal justice, domestic violence intervention, social work, gender-based violence

Context

NICRO (the National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders), a South African NGO with roots dating to 1910, runs a Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence (PIPV) programme for adult men, most of whom are referred by the courts after a domestic-violence charge or protection order. Implementation is coordinated through provincial Area Managers, indicating the model is used beyond a single site, though the exact number of active locations is not published.

Activities

The programme runs for 20 weeks in weekly 90–120 minute group sessions of 10–15 men, combining psycho-educational and cognitive-behavioural methods explicitly framed, in NICRO's own description, as "feminist-oriented" — targeting attitudes about power and control alongside anger management and communication skills. In parallel, NICRO runs a minimum eight-session structured support group for participants' partners or victims.

Results

A 2017 study in the journal Gender and Behaviour (Maphosa & Rasool, University of Johannesburg) examined the programme through interviews with eight men who had completed it; all eight reported they had stopped physical violence against their partners after the programme, and the authors argued that pairing perpetrator programmes with the legal backing of South Africa's Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 was key to compliance and effectiveness.

Conclusions

The evidence base is real but thin: the published evaluation is a small, self-reported qualitative study (n=8) rather than a controlled outcome trial, so its findings should be read as a promising signal rather than proof of effectiveness at scale.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Run by NICRO, coordinated nationally through provincial Area Managers; group facilitators lead weekly 90–120 minute sessions of 10–15 men, A parallel support-group track for participants' partners or victims runs a minimum of eight sessions

Conditions for success

  • Court referral (a domestic-violence charge or protection order) provides a consistent, legally backed intake channel
  • Pairing the programme with the legal backing of South Africa's Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 is described by the evaluators as key to compliance and effectiveness

Common failure modes

  • The only published evaluation is a small self-reported qualitative study (n=8), not a controlled outcome trial, so effectiveness at scale is unproven

Where it fits

Governance type
national NGO, court-linked
Scale
national (exact number of active sites not published)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful