evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Victoria's Men's Behaviour Change Program Network

Australia · Melbourne · See the Australia profile · See the Melbourne profile

Top 29% 85/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

No to Violence coordinates 150+ accredited Men's Behaviour Change Program providers in Victoria, Australia. A 2016 Monash University study found men's violent behaviour halved right after the programme, falling further at 1-2 years.

Victoria's Men's Behaviour Change Program Network

Details

Promoter
No to Violence (Men's Referral Service)
Period
1990s–present
Keywords
gender-based violence, family violence, perpetrator intervention, social services, criminal justice

Description

No to Violence is the peak body for organisations delivering Men's Behaviour Change Programs (MBCPs) to men who use family violence in Victoria, Australia. It coordinates a network of more than 150 accredited member organisations and runs the statewide Men's Referral Service, a confidential telephone line for men seeking help to stop using violence.
Programmes follow Victoria's 2017 Minimum Standards, typically running for at least 20 weeks of group work, and take both court-mandated and self- or family-referred participants. Curriculum content and delivery format vary by provider within the shared minimum-standards framework.
A 2016 Monash University longitudinal study (Brown, Flynn, Fernandez Arias et al.) tracking men through and after MBCPs found that the number of men reporting violent behaviour fell by half across all 15 measured items of violence immediately after programme completion, and continued to fall at one-year and two-year follow-up — evidence of sustained rather than short-lived change.
The Victorian Family Violence Reform Implementation Monitor has flagged governance gaps behind this evidence: there is no centralised, independent accreditation body, and providers largely self-assess compliance through unaudited annual reviews. Separate reporting has also described difficulties getting newer, evidence-informed delivery models (such as online programmes) accredited within the existing framework.

Read the full analysis: https://ntv.org.au/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful