evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Observatorio de IA en el Estado — AGESIC's National Survey and Registry of Government AI Use in Uruguay

Uruguay · Montevideo · See the Uruguay profile · See the Montevideo profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 74% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

AGESIC's Observatory surveys Uruguay's public bodies on their AI use and publishes the results with transparency guidance. Its 2024 survey, sent to 60 organisations, drew 22 responses reporting 27 AI use cases — only 8 of them actually operational.

60 organisations
Organisations surveyed (by 30 June 2024)
22 organisations
Organisations responding
27 use cases / initiatives
AI use cases reported
8 use cases
Use cases confirmed operational
9 of 22
Responding organisations reporting no AI use
Observatorio de IA en el Estado — AGESIC's National Survey and Registry of Government AI Use in Uruguay

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Agencia de Gobierno Electrónico y Sociedad de la Información y del Conocimiento (AGESIC), Uruguay
Period
2022–ongoing
Keywords
public administration, digital government, AI governance, open government

Context

Created under commitment 1.6 of Uruguay's Fifth National Action Plan for Open Government (2021–2024), the Observatorio de Inteligencia Artificial en el Estado was launched between June 2022 and June 2023 by AGESIC together with the Unit for Access to Public Information (UAIP) to track and publish how the Uruguayan state actually uses AI.

Activities

AGESIC periodically surveys public bodies on their AI use, and alongside the survey it publishes recommendations on algorithmic transparency for public bodies, aligning AI disclosure with Uruguay's existing transparency and public-information-access rules — positioning the Observatory as a governance and policy-analysis tool rather than a compliance mandate.

Results

As of 30 June 2024 the survey had been sent to 60 organisations, received responses from 22, and published details of 27 reported AI applications or initiatives — of which only 8 were confirmed operational and functioning, while the other 19 were still in development, testing, or had been discontinued. Nine of the 22 responding organisations reported no AI use at all.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No budget disclosed; conservative low estimate for a periodic government survey/registry mechanism.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Run jointly by AGESIC and the Unit for Access to Public Information (UAIP)

Conditions for success

  • Anchored in a formal Open Government Partnership action-plan commitment (UY0143)
  • Periodic survey of public bodies combined with published algorithmic-transparency recommendations

Common failure modes

  • Only 22 of 60 surveyed organisations responded, and 9 of those reported no AI use at all
  • Of 27 reported AI applications, only 8 were confirmed operational; the rest were in development, testing, or discontinued

Where it fits

Governance type
national digital government agency
Scale
national
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful