evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

OISL's Interactive-Voice-Response Campaign — A Randomized Trial That Nearly Doubled Mobile-Banking Use Among Low-Literacy Ghanaian Borrowers

Ghana · Accra · See the Ghana profile · See the Accra profile

Top 61% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A randomized trial gave 5,000 rural Ghanaian microfinance clients ten weekly automated voice calls about mobile banking. Monthly transactions nearly doubled and late loan repayment fell 8%, at a cost of $0.28 per customer per month — though the same calls did not increase saving.

OISL's Interactive-Voice-Response Campaign — A Randomized Trial That Nearly Doubled Mobile-Banking Use Among Low-Literacy Ghanaian Borrowers

Details

Promoter
Opportunity International Savings and Loans (OISL), with Innovations for Poverty Action / J-PAL
Period
Aug 2020 – Apr 2021
Keywords
financial inclusion, interactive voice response, microfinance, digital literacy

Description

OISL, a rural lender licensed by the Bank of Ghana in 2004 and serving low-income, often low-literacy clients across most of Ghana's regions, partnered with researchers from Innovations for Poverty Action and J-PAL to test whether phone-based information alone could raise use of a mobile-banking channel that avoids branch visits, paperwork and reading requirements.

15,000 clients were randomly assigned in August–November 2020 to three groups: 5,000 received ten weekly interactive-voice-response (IVR) calls, in local language, explaining mobile-banking benefits and how to use the service; 5,000 received IVR calls with general savings advice as an active control; 5,000 received no calls. Outcomes were measured through April 2021.

Clients who got the mobile-banking calls were 6.3 percentage points more likely to transact that month, versus 2.4 points in the comparison group; average monthly transactions roughly doubled (0.075 to 0.15) and average transaction value roughly tripled ($1.76 to $6.40). Late loan repayment fell 2.4 percentage points, an 8% relative drop from a baseline near 30%, improving clients' access to follow-on loans. The intervention cost roughly $0.28 per customer per month. The savings-advice-only calls produced no measurable behaviour change, and neither treatment arm increased savings balances — a limitation the researchers report without softening it.

The trial was pre-registered with the AEA Social Science Registry, and the results were published in the peer-reviewed journal Economic Development and Cultural Change (Riley & Shonchoy, 2025); the paper reports the mobile-banking effect persisted at 9-month follow-up, with treated clients 2 percentage points (11% relative) more likely to still hold a bank loan.

Read the full analysis: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-732597.html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful