evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

One Stop Centres in Shinyanga and Singida — Tanzania's KOICA-Funded Hospital-Based GBV Response, and Survivors' View of Its Gaps

Tanzania · Shinyanga · See the Tanzania profile

Top 78% 41/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

UNFPA and UN Women handed over three one-stop centres and a police gender desk in Singida and Shinyanga (KOICA, USD 4.9m). A 2024 survey of 96 survivors in Shinyanga found low awareness, stigma, thin privacy and staff, budget and transport gaps.

One Stop Centres in Shinyanga and Singida — Tanzania's KOICA-Funded Hospital-Based GBV Response, and Survivors' View of Its Gaps

Details

Promoter
UNFPA and UN Women with Tanzanian local authorities and health facilities; funded by KOICA (Republic of Korea)
Period
2020–2023 programme; centres handed over May 2023
Keywords
gender-based violence, health, legal aid, psychosocial support, one-stop centre

Description

Under the joint programme "Realizing Gender Equality through Empowering Women and Adolescent Girls" (2020-2023), UNFPA and UN Women, funded by the Republic of Korea through KOICA (USD 4.9 million), handed over in May 2023 three One Stop Centres (Ikungi District Hospital and Singida Referral Hospital in Singida; Bugarama Health Centre in Shinyanga), a Police Gender and Children's Desk in Bugarama and a produce collection centre. One Stop Centres offer health, legal and psychosocial support to GBV survivors in one place. UNFPA reports that the programme reached over 10,000 people, trained over 450 duty bearers on preventing and responding to violence against women and children, and trained nearly 300 health workers in GBV case management.
An independent cross-sectional, mixed-methods study (Mntambo and Bwikizo, East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2024) surveyed 96 female GBV survivors in Shinyanga Region and interviewed key informants. Sexual and physical violence were the most common forms reported at the centres. Services differ between centres depending on staff, accessibility, partner funding and testing equipment. Among barriers recorded (136 mentions), 36.8% were limited awareness of the centres, 35.3% fear of shame and stigma, 14.7% reluctance to report in order to protect a family-member perpetrator and 7.4% insufficient privacy and trained staff. Centres reported staff shortages, budget constraints and inadequate transport.
The evidence is perceptions and process counts: neither source measures reductions in violence, case outcomes or costs, and the study is regional with a modest sample. The practice is included as a transferable example of donor-built one-stop capacity whose sustainability depends on government funding and stakeholder collaboration, as the authors recommend.

Read the full analysis: https://tanzania.unfpa.org/en/node/144762

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful