evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ONS's AI Push in Official Statistics — From SIC/SOC Autocoding Research to ScannerAI's Receipt-Reading Prototype

United Kingdom · Newport · See the United Kingdom profile · See the Newport profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 46% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

ONS's Data Science Campus benchmarked ML autocoding for SIC/SOC survey classification, reaching 73–85% match rates across five surveys versus 50–62% for the rule-based tool, and is prototyping ScannerAI to auto-extract data from ~60,000 household receipts submitted yearly.

50–62 %
Rule-based baseline match rate
73% match / 84% accuracy
ML approach match/accuracy, Census SOC data
70% match / 85% accuracy
ML approach match/accuracy, Labour Force Survey
ONS's AI Push in Official Statistics — From SIC/SOC Autocoding Research to ScannerAI's Receipt-Reading Prototype

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Office for National Statistics (ONS) — Data Science Campus
Period
2023–2026
Keywords
official statistics, public administration, data science, government efficiency

Context

ONS assigns free-text survey responses to SIC/SOC classification codes across major surveys; its Data Science Campus prototyped a logistic-regression machine-learning alternative to the existing rule-based fuzzy-matching tool.

Results

The ML approach reached 73% match/84% accuracy on Census SOC data and 70% match/85% accuracy on the Labour Force Survey, versus a 50–62% baseline match rate, but performance dropped sharply on a fifth survey (60% vs 84%), and the code (ACE2) remains open-sourced research rather than deployed; a parallel ScannerAI receipt-reading pipeline remains an early-phase, untested prototype.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
ONS Data Science Campus

Conditions for success

  • Sufficient gold-coded training data volume for SIC classification

Common failure modes

  • Model does not transfer cleanly across different respondent populations (60% vs 84% match on a fifth survey)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful