evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Pipeline Canopy Bridges for Golden Lion Tamarins — Projeto Connect, São João River Basin (Brazil)

Brazil · Silva Jardim · See the Brazil profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 96% 20/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Canopy bridges strung across a 25-30 m pipeline right-of-way in Brazil's São João River Basin protected area recorded 455 common-marmoset and 257 golden-lion-tamarin crossings in a 2019-2020 camera-trap study, though both species showed heightened vigilance versus forest routes.

1,917
Total crossing events recorded
455
Pipeline-bridge crossings by common marmosets
257
Pipeline-bridge crossings by golden lion tamarins
Pipeline Canopy Bridges for Golden Lion Tamarins — Projeto Connect, São João River Basin (Brazil)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF); Associação Mico-Leão-Dourado; Petrobras
Period
2019-2020
Keywords
biodiversity connectivity, primate conservation, pipeline right-of-way mitigation, applied ecology research

Context

Gas and oil pipelines operated by Petrobras/Transpetro cross the Environmental Protection Area of the Sao Joao River Basin/Golden Lion Tamarin (APA-BRSJ) in Rio de Janeiro state, a stronghold for the endangered golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia). Because forest cannot be allowed to grow directly over pipelines for safety reasons, the resulting 25-30 m cleared right-of-way strips act as barriers for tamarins, marmosets and other canopy-dependent species, fragmenting their habitat.

Activities

Under Projeto Connect -- run by the Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF) with Associacao Mico-Leao-Dourado and Petrobras funding -- researchers installed simple canopy bridges spanning the cleared strip and monitored them with camera traps from September 2019 to April 2020, later adding forest-based control bridges for comparison (July-November 2020).

Results

Of 1,917 total crossing events recorded, researchers analysed 356 in detail, finding 455 pipeline-bridge crossings by common marmosets and 257 by golden lion tamarins. Both species crossed pipeline bridges significantly faster and with more vigilance behaviour than on matched forest-canopy control bridges, evidence that the bridges function but that animals still perceive the open right-of-way as a higher-predation-risk environment.

Conclusions

The evidence is genuinely mixed: this specific canopy-bridge design achieved real, quantified crossings by the target species, but the Associacao Mico-Leao-Dourado's own project reporting notes that other passage types installed under the same broader programme have so far been used mainly by foxes, seriemas and anteaters, with tamarins and radio-collared sloths not yet recorded using those particular structures -- a reminder that passage design details matter and that not every crossing type succeeds equally.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Funded by Petrobras; specific budget not itemised.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Camera-trap monitoring September 2019-April 2020, with control-bridge comparison July-November 2020.
Staffing & skills
Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF) researchers, Associacao Mico-Leao-Dourado, Petrobras (funder)

Conditions for success

  • Simple canopy-bridge design spanning the cleared pipeline right-of-way
  • Camera-trap monitoring with forest-based control bridges added for comparison

Common failure modes

  • Animals cross pipeline bridges faster and with more vigilance, suggesting perceived higher predation risk than forest canopy
  • Other passage types in the same broader programme have so far been used mainly by non-target species (foxes, seriemas, anteaters), not tamarins or sloths

Where it fits

Governance type
university research project with corporate (Petrobras) funding and NGO partner
Scale
single protected area (APA-BRSJ, Rio de Janeiro state)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful