evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Pocosin Lakes Peatland Restoration & ACR Carbon Accounting Methodology (USA)

United States of America · Columbia · See the United States of America profile

The Nature Conservancy has rewetted 37,000+ acres of pocosin peatland at Pocosin Lakes NWR, NC, and with TerraCarbon built the first ACR-approved peatland carbon methodology for the Southeast coastal plain, backed by a $67.8M EPA grant to restore 33,000 more acres.

101,600 acres
Refuge peat soil area
37,000+ acres
Pocosin peatland rewetted/restored
41,534 acres
2008 Evans Road Wildfire area burned (2008, 3 months)
450 firefighters
Firefighters required for 2008 wildfire
67.8 USD M
EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grant (2024) (awarded July 2024)
33,000 acres
Additional acreage targeted for restoration under EPA grant
10,500 acres
Additional acreage targeted for protection under EPA grant
Pocosin Lakes Peatland Restoration & ACR Carbon Accounting Methodology (USA)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
The Nature Conservancy (North Carolina Chapter), with U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and TerraCarbon
Period
1990s–present (restoration); ACR methodology approved 2022; EPA CPRG grant 2024–2029
Keywords
peatland restoration, carbon accounting methodology, wildfire risk reduction, wetland hydrology, voluntary carbon market

Context

Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in eastern North Carolina protects one of the largest remaining pocosin peat-wetland complexes in the United States. Decades of agricultural and forestry drainage before the refuge's 1990 creation left much of its roughly 101,600 acres of peat soil oxidizing and emitting carbon, and prone to catastrophic peat fires -- most notably the 2008 Evans Road Wildfire, which burned 41,534 acres of the refuge for three months and required 450 firefighters to contain.

Objectives

Rewet drained pocosin peat to reduce ongoing carbon emissions and wildfire risk, and establish a carbon-accounting methodology that lets landowners fund further restoration through voluntary carbon credit sales.

Activities

Since the 1990s the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and The Nature Conservancy have installed water-control structures to rewet drained pocosin, restoring more than 37,000 acres. TNC and carbon-project developer TerraCarbon built the first peatland carbon-accounting methodology (Version 1.0) approved by the American Carbon Registry, applicable to any peat-restoration project across the Southeast coastal plain. In July 2024 the EPA awarded TNC's North Carolina chapter $67.8 million -- part of a $421 million regional Climate Pollution Reduction Grant -- to restore a further 33,000 acres and protect 10,500 acres of peatland across North Carolina and Virginia.

Results

As of 2023 reporting, no peatland carbon credits under this methodology had yet been sold commercially: enrollment requires third-party audits and site-specific baselines that reporters describe as far more complex than trading conventional securities.

Conclusions

Experts caution that the wider, largely unregulated voluntary carbon market carries a real risk of greenwashing without strong integrity standards -- a caution relevant to this methodology's future credit sales even though the underlying restoration work itself is well documented.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — $67.8M EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grant awarded July 2024 (part of a $421M regional grant) funds the next restoration phase (33,000 acres) plus protection of 10,500 acres.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Restoration ongoing since the 1990s; ACR methodology approved 2022; EPA grant funds a 2024-2029 phase.
Staffing & skills
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (refuge management, water-control structures), The Nature Conservancy, North Carolina Chapter (restoration delivery, carbon methodology), TerraCarbon (carbon-project methodology developer), American Carbon Registry (methodology approval/standard body)

Conditions for success

  • Water-control infrastructure to rewet drained peat
  • Approved carbon-accounting methodology enabling voluntary carbon finance
  • Large grant funding (EPA Climate Pollution Reduction Grant) to fund scale-up

Common failure modes

  • As of 2023 reporting, no peatland carbon credits under this methodology had been sold commercially; enrollment requires third-party audits and site-specific baselines described as far more complex than trading conventional securities
  • Experts caution the wider voluntary carbon market carries a real risk of greenwashing without strong integrity standards

Where it fits

Governance type
Federal wildlife refuge with NGO restoration partner and carbon-market mechanism
Scale
101,600-acre refuge; 37,000+ acres restored to date; 33,000 more acres planned
Income level
High-income (USA)

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful