evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

PRIA-MA — Spain's National Behaviour-Change Programme for Gender-Violence Offenders on Alternative Sentences

Spain · Alicante · See the Spain profile · See the Alicante profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 42% 74/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2010, Spain's prison service has run PRIA-MA, a mandatory group programme for men convicted of gender violence on community sentences. A 2023 study of 101 offenders in Alicante found 6.3% two-year recidivism among completers versus 11.7% among dropouts.

6.3 %
Two-year recidivism rate among programme completers (2018–2020 follow-up)
11.7 %
Two-year recidivism rate among dropouts (2018–2020 follow-up)
21.8 %
Programme dropout rate
101 men
Study sample size

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias, Ministerio del Interior (Spain)
Period
2010–present
Region (NUTS)
ES521
Keywords
criminal justice, probation, gender-based violence

Context

PRIA-MA (Programa de Intervención para Agresores en Medidas Alternativas) is Spain's mandatory group-therapy programme for men convicted of gender-based violence and serving community sentences rather than prison, run nationwide since 2010 by the Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias (Spain's Ministry of Interior) through its Alternative Measures and Penalties Management Service.

Objectives

The programme addresses responsibility-taking, anger management, sexist attitudes and non-violent relationship skills, combining individual assessment with group sessions over roughly ten months.

Activities

A 2023 peer-reviewed evaluation published in REC. Revista Electrónica de Criminología followed 101 men who went through the programme at the Alicante Penitentiary Centre's alternative-measures unit, tracking recidivism for further ill-treatment offences over a two-year follow-up after completion (2018–2020).

Results

The study recorded a 6.3% recidivism rate among those who completed PRIA-MA, compared with 11.7% among the 21.8% of participants who dropped out before finishing.

Conclusions

The authors are explicit that this is not a causal impact evaluation: because Spanish law requires all offenders on alternative measures to undergo treatment, no untreated comparison group exists, so the lower recidivism among completers cannot be attributed to the programme with certainty — it may partly reflect that lower-risk men are also more likely to finish. The evaluators' main recommendation is to invest in adherence and motivation work to reduce the sizeable dropout rate, which is itself associated with worse outcomes.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Cost not disclosed; nationwide mandatory group-therapy programme run by the national prison/probation service since 2010.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Individual programme cycle runs roughly ten months; the evaluated cohort was followed for two years post-completion (2018–2020).
Staffing & skills
Run nationwide by Spain's Secretaría General de Instituciones Penitenciarias (Ministry of Interior) through its Alternative Measures and Penalties Management Service, Combines individual assessment with group-therapy sessions over roughly ten months

Conditions for success

  • Mandatory participation under Spanish law for offenders serving alternative (non-custodial) sentences
  • Reducing the roughly 21.8% dropout rate through adherence and motivation work, since dropouts show worse recidivism outcomes

Common failure modes

  • No untreated comparison group exists in Spain because all offenders on alternative measures must undergo treatment, so lower recidivism among completers cannot be attributed to the programme with certainty
  • A sizeable dropout rate (21.8%) is itself associated with worse recidivism outcomes

Where it fits

Governance type
national criminal-justice/probation system
Scale
national programme, evaluated at the Alicante site
Income level
high income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful