A randomised trial of 178 grade 1-4 pupils found Project LISTEN's speech-recognising Reading Tutor beat sustained silent reading on total reading and basic skills composites (WWC: meets standards without reservations), with no significant gains in comprehension or fluency.
Details
Promoter
Carnegie Mellon University (Project LISTEN)
Period
2013 (trial of 7 months)
Keywords
reading tutor, speech recognition, early literacy, randomised trial
Description
Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor listens to children read aloud using speech recognition and gives individualised oral reading practice and feedback. Mostow, Nelson-Taylor and Beck (2013, Journal of Educational Computing Research) ran a randomised controlled trial in two elementary schools of one affluent suburban district: 193 pupils in grades 1-4 were randomly assigned and 178 contributed to the findings. Pupils averaged 19 hours on the tutor over 7 months, versus 20-25 minutes of daily sustained silent reading in class. The What Works Clearinghouse rated the study as meeting standards without reservations because of low attrition, and rated the evidence Promising (Tier 3) for literacy achievement and phonics. Significant advantages were found on the Woodcock Reading Mastery Test total reading composite (480.01 vs 471.49), the basic skills composite (477.80 vs 463.25) and word identification, plus phonemic blending and spelling at one month. Differences in reading comprehension, oral reading fluency, word attack and reading attitude were not significant. Limits: the rating rests on a single study in two high-resourced schools, so transfer to other contexts is unproven.
Read the full analysis: https://ri.cmu.edu/?p=8210
Implementation
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.