evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Protecting Country Against Invasive Species — Indigenous Ranger-Led Control (Northern Australia)

Australia · Darwin · See the Australia profile

Australia's Indigenous Rangers Program funds 40+ ranger groups across northern Australia to control feral pigs, cats and invasive weeds like gamba grass; independent SROI studies found up to AUD 3.40 of social value per AUD 1 invested.

1.3 AUD billion
Government investment in Indigenous Rangers Program (2021-2028)
770 FTE positions
Ranger positions supported (full-time equivalent) (current)
108+ groups
Ranger groups funded nationally (current)
40+ groups
Ranger groups delivering PCAIS (current)
2 AUD million
Additional PCAIS grant (2025) (2025)
27 pigs
GPS-collared feral pigs
up to 3.40 AUD value per AUD 1 invested
Social return on investment (2016 consolidated report) (2016)
roughly 3:1 ratio
Social return on investment (site-level, Girringun/Tjaltjraak)
Protecting Country Against Invasive Species — Indigenous Ranger-Led Control (Northern Australia)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
NAILSMA (North Australian Indigenous Land & Sea Management Alliance) / Australian Government (DAFF, NIAA)
Period
2007-present (PCAIS component 2021-present)
Keywords
invasive species control, Indigenous ranger employment, feral animal management, weed control, biosecurity

Context

Since 2007, the Australian Government's Indigenous Rangers Program (originally "Working on Country") has funded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ranger groups to manage Indigenous Protected Areas and other Country, with invasive species control as a core task. Government investment now exceeds AUD 1.3 billion for 2021-2028, supporting roughly 770 full-time-equivalent ranger positions across 108+ ranger groups nationally.

Activities

Within this framework, the "Protecting Country Against Invasive Species" (PCAIS) initiative, coordinated by NAILSMA and boosted by a further AUD 2 million Australian Government grant (2025), channels direct funding to more than 40 Indigenous ranger groups across Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland. Rangers combine traditional ecological knowledge with aerial surveys, GPS-collared feral pigs (27 collared under the programme), trapping, shooting and baiting to control feral pigs and cats and invasive weeds such as Siam weed and gamba grass.

Results

A 2016 Social Return on Investment (SROI) analysis commissioned by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet found Indigenous Protected Areas employing rangers generated up to AUD 3.40 of social, economic, cultural and environmental value per AUD 1 invested; a site-level SROI study of the Girringun and Tjaltjraak ranger programmes independently found ratios of roughly 3:1.

Conclusions

Feral pig and gamba grass populations continue to expand faster than control capacity in many regions, and most published evaluation to date is programme-level (jobs, capacity, SROI) rather than population-level (measured hectares or animal-density reduction) - ecological outcomes are more strongly evidenced for employment and governance than for quantified biodiversity or fire impact.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Broader Indigenous Rangers Program funded at over AUD 1.3 billion (2021-2028); the PCAIS component received an additional AUD 2 million Australian Government grant in 2025; per-programme costs are not separately published.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Indigenous Rangers Program running since 2007; PCAIS-specific funding committed 2021-2028.
Staffing & skills
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rangers (roughly 770 FTE positions nationally across 108+ groups), 40+ Indigenous ranger groups delivering PCAIS across Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland, NAILSMA coordination

Conditions for success

  • Combining traditional ecological knowledge with technical methods (aerial surveys, GPS collars, trapping, shooting, baiting)
  • Sustained multi-year federal funding (AUD 1.3bn, 2021-2028)
  • NAILSMA-coordinated delivery network across jurisdictions

Common failure modes

  • Feral pig and gamba grass populations continue to expand faster than control capacity in many regions
  • Ecological outcome monitoring is programme-level (jobs, SROI) rather than population-level (hectares treated, animal-density reduction), leaving a measurement gap

Where it fits

Governance type
Federal government funding delivered through Indigenous-led ranger organisations, coordinated by NAILSMA
Scale
National programme (108+ ranger groups); PCAIS component spans 40+ groups across WA, NT and Queensland

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful