evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ramot at Tel Aviv University — Israel's Third Major University Tech-Transfer Office

Israel · Tel Aviv · See the Israel profile · See the Tel Aviv profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 76% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Founded in 1973, Ramot has filed 5,000+ patent applications for Tel Aviv University research and spun off 100+ companies — including the USB patent behind SanDisk's $1.55bn M-Systems buy — though a 2022-2024 Cisco suit saw a US court invalidate some patent claims.

>5,000
Patent applications filed
>1,300
Inventions covered by patents
66th
Global ranking for US patents granted (2018) (2018)
1st
Israel ranking for US patents granted (2018) (2018)
37
US patents registered via Ramot (2018)
>100
Start-up companies formed from TAU IP
1.55 USD billion
M-Systems acquisition price (SanDisk)
23.5 USD million
Momentum Fund raised (2014) (2014)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
Period
1973-2024
Keywords
technology transfer, IP licensing, university spin-offs, venture funding

Context

Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. was founded in 1973 as the exclusive technology-transfer company of Tel Aviv University (TAU), wholly owned by the university. It manages IP protection, patent licensing and venture financing for university research, and operates the Momentum Fund, a venture-financing arm for TAU-linked startups.

Results

TAU's own site credits Ramot with more than 5,000 patent applications covering over 1,300 inventions, and reports the university ranked 66th globally and 1st in Israel for US patents granted in 2018, with 37 US patents registered that year through Ramot. Ramot cites over 100 start-up companies formed from TAU IP; an independently reported example is a flash-storage patent filed by Ramot in 2004 and licensed to M-Systems roughly a year later, with M-Systems later acquired by SanDisk for $1.55 billion. The Momentum Fund raised $23.5 million in 2014 from investors including Temasek and Tata Group (each committing at least $5 million) plus SanDisk, financing startups QArt Medical, Unispectral, Trobix, Multivu and Silib.

Conclusions

Ramot's model has also generated legal friction: in 2022 Cisco filed for declaratory non-infringement against a newly issued Ramot patent (US 11,342,998) the same day it was granted, and Ramot counter-sued; in November 2024 a US federal judge ruled several of the patent's claims indefinite, a partial win for Cisco, while other claims survived. No independent academic or governmental evaluation specifically assessing Ramot's model was located.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Technology-transfer office staff handling IP protection and patent filing, Licensing professionals negotiating deals with industry, Venture fund managers running the Momentum Fund

Conditions for success

  • Exclusive IP mandate from the university
  • Sustained, high-volume patent filing pipeline
  • Access to venture capital partners for spin-off financing

Common failure modes

  • Patent litigation risk from third parties challenging newly granted patents (e.g. Cisco case)
  • Court rulings can invalidate or narrow key patent claims after they are granted

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 76

EPFL Innovation Park (Lausanne)

Switzerland

Science park attached to a technical university that has hosted 500+ deep-tech startups over three decades, with EPFL spin-offs raising …