evidoria

What works in Israel

All catalogues

25
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Israel

Israel has developed multiple innovation and inclusion initiatives across sectors. Access Israel's mystery-shopper accessibility audits completed over 300 paid assessments by 2021 to audit business accessibility, while the Yozma Program catalyzed the venture-capital industry by committing $100M in 1993 to co-invest in ten hybrid VC funds, growing Israel's VC sector from ~$30M (1992) to ~$10B under management (2001). Tel Aviv ranks as the world's #4 startup ecosystem with a USD 250 billion ecosystem value and 180+ multinational R&D centres, supported by city-led infrastructure development and national policy. CityZone serves as Israel's first urban-tech living lab, designated a national beta site with NIS 40 million in R&D investment, though the practices do not report completion metrics or startups scaled.

Drawn from: Access Israel — Disability-Led Mystery-Shopper Accessibility Audits · Yozma Program — Israel's Government-Seeded Venture Capital Catalyst · Tel Aviv Tech — City-Led Startup Ecosystem Development and Global Talent Attraction · CityZone – Tel Aviv Urban-Tech Living Lab · Voiceitt — AI Speech Recognition for Atypical and Dysarthric Speech · OrCam MyEye: AI Wearable Reading Device for Blind and Low-Vision Users — A Cautionary Case · Tsofen High-Tech Centers – Arab-Jewish Tech Workforce Integration (Israel) · Israel Ministry of Education — National AI Integration Programme for Grades 4–12

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average

Evaluation evidence +35 pts 80 here · 45 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +28 pts 78 here · 50 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 37 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +16 pts 74 here · 59 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Innovation +15 pts 78 here · 63 average

Scalability beyond pilot +13 pts 77 here · 64 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity -29 pts 13 here · 42 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 31
Evaluation evidence
80 · 45
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 50
Curator validation
100 · 74
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 37
Evidence of impact / measured public value
74 · 59
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Innovation
78 · 63
Scalability beyond pilot
77 · 64
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Governance, capability & sustainability
72 · 64
Sustainability / continuity
85 · 78
Documented learning
80 · 74
Demonstrated reach
80 · 76
Transferability / demonstrated replication
57 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
70 · 76
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Equity & inclusion
44 · 52
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
13 · 42
Efficiency
0 · 44
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Israel. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Access Israel — Disability-Led Mystery-Shopper Accessibility Audits · 92

Yozma Program — Israel's Government-Seeded Venture Capital Catalyst · 81

Tel Aviv Tech — City-Led Startup Ecosystem Development and Global Talent Attraction · 81

CityZone – Tel Aviv Urban-Tech Living Lab · 76

Voiceitt — AI Speech Recognition for Atypical and Dysarthric Speech · 76

OrCam MyEye: AI Wearable Reading Device for Blind and Low-Vision Users — A Cautionary Case · 76

Tsofen High-Tech Centers – Arab-Jewish Tech Workforce Integration (Israel) · 76

Israel Ministry of Education — National AI Integration Programme for Grades 4–12 · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Israel concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more