evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Rothenthurm Initiative — Constitutional Moor Protection & Peatland Carbon Offsets (Switzerland)

Switzerland · Rothenthurm · See the Switzerland profile

A 1987 referendum (58% approval) enshrined moor protection in the Swiss constitution; ~550 raised bogs and 1,200+ fens are now safeguarded nationally. myclimate runs SGS-validated peatland carbon projects, e.g. 3.8 ha at Schwändital (3,521 tCO2e over 50 years).

58 %
Referendum approval (6 December 1987)
163,000 signatures
Signatures gathered for citizens' initiative (1983 (~6 months))
550 bogs
Raised bogs protected nationally
1,200-1,335 fens
Fens of national importance protected
240 km2
Total area under national moor protection
90 %
Historic moor loss prior to protection (preceding two centuries (estimate))
3.8 ha
Area rewetted at Schwändital (Gross Moos site)
3,521 tCO2e
Estimated CO2e avoided at Schwändital (over 50 years)
24,000 ha
Total nationally protected moor area (for scale comparison)
Rothenthurm Initiative — Constitutional Moor Protection & Peatland Carbon Offsets (Switzerland)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Swiss Confederation (Federal Office for the Environment, BAFU) / myclimate
Period
1987-present
Keywords
moor and peatland protection, constitutional law, voluntary carbon offset, ecosystem restoration

Context

In 1983, farmers from Rothenthurm and WWF Switzerland launched a citizens' initiative to stop a planned Swiss Army training ground on a roughly 100-hectare upland moor in the Biber valley, Canton Schwyz — one of the country's last large raised bogs. The campaign gathered 163,000 signatures within about six months. On 6 December 1987, Swiss voters approved the initiative with 58% support, making Switzerland the only country to date to enshrine moor protection directly in its federal constitution (Article 78). Cantons are now legally obliged to protect, and where possible restore, moors of national importance.

Objectives

The initiative's immediate objective was to block a specific Swiss Army training ground on an ecologically significant upland moor. Its longer-term aim, achieved through the 1987 referendum, was to secure durable constitutional protection and restoration obligations for moors and fens of national importance across Switzerland, rather than relying on ordinary, more easily reversed legislation.

Activities

Building on this legal foundation, voluntary carbon-offset projects have since emerged. myclimate, working with local alpine cooperatives (Alpkorporationen) and cantonal authorities, runs SGS-validated peatland rewetting projects, applying a methodology developed by the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL). Comparable myclimate projects operate at Teufimatt, La Gruère and Sous-Martel-Dernier in addition to the Schwändital site.

Results

Today roughly 550 raised bogs and around 1,200-1,335 fens of national importance are protected under Article 78, covering about 240 km2 (some 0.6% of Swiss territory). At the Gross Moos site in Schwändital, Canton Glarus, 3.8 hectares were rewetted for an estimated 3,521 tCO2e avoided over 50 years. These protections preserve only a fraction of the moors that existed before an estimated 90% were destroyed over the preceding two centuries.

Conclusions

Individual carbon projects remain small — a few hectares each — relative to Switzerland's roughly 24,000 hectares of nationally protected moor, and function as discrete voluntary offsets rather than a national crediting mechanism. The 1987 initiative's principal, best-evidenced achievement is durable legal protection of existing carbon stocks, rather than large-scale new sequestration.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Local farmers and WWF Switzerland organizers who led the 1983-1987 citizens' initiative campaign, Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU) implementing constitutional moor-protection obligations, myclimate, working with local alpine cooperatives (Alpkorporationen) and cantonal authorities, developing and running voluntary peatland rewetting projects, SGS as independent validator and WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) providing the underlying rewetting/carbon methodology

Conditions for success

  • A broad citizen coalition (farmers plus an environmental NGO) able to gather the signatures required to force a binding national referendum
  • Direct-democracy mechanism (popular initiative) allowing constitutional-level, durable legal protection rather than ordinary legislation
  • Cantonal legal obligation to protect and, where possible, restore moors of national importance, giving the constitutional article practical teeth
  • Independent third-party validation (SGS) and a recognised scientific methodology (WSL) to give voluntary carbon projects credibility

Common failure modes

  • Voluntary carbon-offset projects remain small (a few hectares each) relative to the ~24,000 ha of nationally protected moor, so they cannot substitute for a national crediting mechanism
  • Constitutional protection came after an estimated 90% of Swiss moors had already been destroyed, illustrating that legal protection alone cannot recover already-lost habitat

Where it fits

Governance type
national government / direct democracy (federal referendum) with cantonal implementation
Scale
national (constitutional provision) with small-scale voluntary carbon pilot projects
Income level
high-income

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 93

UK Peatland Code

United Kingdom

The UK's quality-assurance standard for peatland restoration: it issues verified carbon units for rewetting degraded peat, delivering bundled carbon, water …