evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Safer City — Botswana's Nationwide AI-Enabled Police Camera Network

Botswana · Gaborone · See the Botswana profile · See the Gaborone profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 100% 7/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Botswana's police deployed an AI-enabled CCTV/facial-recognition network of 1,000+ cameras across two cities at a cost of billions of pula, but the country's own procurement regulator ruled part of the rollout improper, and no crime-impact data has been published.

650
Operational cameras in Gaborone
524
Operational cameras in Francistown
2000
Planned camera expansion, Gaborone
974
Planned camera expansion, Francistown
~P3 billion
Phase 1 (Gaborone) cost
~P10 billion
Full three-phase national rollout cost
P77.7 million
FY2020/21 BPS budget line for cameras, LTE and fingerprint systems
Safer City — Botswana's Nationwide AI-Enabled Police Camera Network

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Botswana Police Service, with Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Board (PPADB) oversight; deployed by Huawei Technologies Botswana
Period
Announced 2016; deployed 2019–2022; procurement contested 2021
Keywords
public safety, surveillance, facial recognition, automatic number-plate recognition, policing

Context

The Safer City project, first flagged in President Ian Khama's 2016 State of the Nation Address, is a police-run HD CCTV and automatic number-plate recognition (ANPR) network deployed by the Botswana Police Service (BPS) with technology vendor Huawei Technologies Botswana. Xinhua reported the system became operational in Gaborone and Francistown as of February 2020, feeding a command centre at Kutlwano Police Station over fibre-optic links.

Objectives

A BPS spokesperson cited goals of securing life and property and countering terrorism.

Activities

Sunday Standard's Botswana-based investigative reporting puts the network at 650 operational cameras in Gaborone and 524 in Francistown, with BPS plans to expand to 2,000 and 974 respectively, covering major roads, intersections and traffic lights. Business Weekly's reporting, citing tender no. DJS/MMTC/PPOL:083/2014-2015, put Phase 1 (Gaborone, roughly a 50km radius) at approximately P3 billion, with the full three-phase national rollout costed at roughly P10 billion; a separate P77.7 million FY2020/21 BPS budget line covered further cameras, LTE links and fingerprint systems.

Results

No crime-reduction statistics, arrest counts, or facial-recognition accuracy figures have been published for Safer City.

Conclusions

Governance of the project has been genuinely contested, not a clean success. On 15 July 2021 Botswana's own procurement regulator, the PPADB, rejected a selective, direct-appointment tender to Huawei Technologies Botswana and ICT Dynamix, ruling the process improper and its scope undefined. The Association for Progressive Communications separately documents Huawei-partnered cameras with facial-recognition capability in use without clear consent or transparency mechanisms, operating in the absence of a dedicated legal framework beyond Botswana's 2018 Data Protection Act; University of Botswana law professor Tachilisa Balule is quoted stating that no law specifically authorises the project. This is a well-documented case of a large-scale, AI-enabled surveillance rollout with real deployment and cost figures, but an unevaluated, legally contested implementation and no independent evidence of public-safety impact.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Botswana Police Service (BPS) as operating agency, Huawei Technologies Botswana as vendor/deployer, Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Board (PPADB) as procurement oversight body

Common failure modes

  • PPADB ruled a selective, direct-appointment tender improper and its scope undefined (July 2021)
  • No dedicated legal framework specifically authorises the project beyond the 2018 Data Protection Act, per a university law professor
  • Facial-recognition cameras documented in use without clear consent or transparency mechanisms (APC)
  • No crime-reduction or accuracy data published despite billions of pula in spend

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful