evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Singapore's Ministry of Manpower Uses Data Analytics to Target Workplace-Safety Inspections

Singapore · Singapore · See the Singapore profile · See the Singapore profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 66% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Singapore's Ministry of Manpower used data analytics to flag high-risk construction firms for inspection: 600 firms flagged in 2019 had a 90% offense rate once inspected, and a comparable 2018 audit needed 20,000 fewer inspector-hours than the prior manual approach.

600 firms
High-risk construction firms flagged (2019)
90 %
Offense rate among flagged firms once inspected (2019)
650 firms
Firms checked in compliance audit (2018)
20,000 fewer inspector man-hours
Reduction in inspector man-hours versus previous method (2018)
six times fewer formal enforcement actions
Reduction in formal enforcement actions (workplace-safety trial) (not specified)
15 %
Reduction in ministry resources spent (workplace-safety trial) (not specified)
over a third of fatalities
Share of Singapore workplace fatalities in construction (2007-2016)
Singapore's Ministry of Manpower Uses Data Analytics to Target Workplace-Safety Inspections

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Singapore
Period
2013–2019
Keywords
labour inspection, workplace safety, construction, enforcement analytics

Context

Singapore's Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has used data analytics since the early-to-mid 2010s to help decide which workplaces to prioritise for safety and employment-compliance inspections, rather than relying solely on complaints or fixed rotation schedules.

Objectives

Target inspections toward higher-risk construction firms to improve enforcement hit-rates and reduce inspector effort per firm checked.

Activities

In 2019, MOM's data analytics work identified 600 construction firms as high-risk. A separate 2018 compliance exercise targeting illegal foreign-worker hiring checked 650 firms while using about 20,000 fewer inspector man-hours than the ministry's previous, non-analytics-driven method. A related workplace-safety trial combined data analytics, behavioural insights and design thinking to target higher-risk companies for inspection.

Results

When the 600 firms flagged as high-risk in 2019 were subsequently inspected, nine in ten (90%) were found to have offenses, including non-payment of salaries and overtime pay. A related workplace-safety trial required six times fewer formal enforcement actions (such as warning letters) and cut ministry resources spent by about 15%, in construction, a sector that accounted for over a third of Singapore's workplace fatalities between 2007 and 2016.

Conclusions

Public reporting on the program does not disclose the underlying model, its variables, or a formal accuracy evaluation, and MOM has not published the methodology for external audit; the reported figures come from journalism describing the ministry's internal data-science practice rather than from an official MOM technical report or peer-reviewed study.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Analytics-driven inspection targeting used since the early-to-mid 2010s; cited results from a 2018 compliance audit and 2019 high-risk-firm flagging.
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Manpower (MOM) internal data-analytics function

Conditions for success

  • Combining data analytics with behavioural insights and design thinking to target higher-risk companies (per GovInsider reporting)

Common failure modes

  • No model methodology, variables or algorithm name have been publicly disclosed by MOM
  • No independent audit of the analytics has been published

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful