evidoria

What works in Singapore

All catalogues

44
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 41 assessed
7
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Singapore

Singapore has implemented a comprehensive set of digital and social programmes spanning gender equality, fraud prevention, accessibility, and economic inclusion. The Singapore White Paper on Women's Development established 25 cross-ministry gender equality actions informed by 6,000+ participants, while ScamShield achieved a 25% reduction in national scam losses by 2025 by blacklisting 120,000+ scam entities with 900,000+ app downloads. Economic programmes show measurable impact: SMEs Go Digital reached 88,000+ small businesses and raised digital-solution adoption from 78% to 93% (2018–2022), while Seniors Go Digital trained 210,000+ seniors with online payment use doubling from 38% to 78% by 2022. However, the evidence presented is largely descriptive or self-reported, and does not quantify causal attributions—for example, ScamShield's specific contribution cannot be cleanly separated from concurrent national measures.

Drawn from: Singapore White Paper on Women's Development (2022) — Whole-of-Government Gender Equality Action Plan · ScamShield – AI-Powered National Scam Prevention Platform · A11y Playground — GovTech Singapore's Public Self-Assessment Tool for Inclusive Digital Design · SMEs Go Digital — Productivity Solutions Grant for Small Business Digitalisation · Seniors Go Digital · Grab Women Driver-Partners Programme: Closing the Gender Gap in Southeast Asia's Ride-Hailing Economy · AI-Based Dengue Early Warning System — Singapore NEA's Machine-Learning Outbreak Forecasting · Pair — Singapore's generative-AI assistant for public officers

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Scalability beyond pilot +18 pts 82 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Governance, capability & sustainability +14 pts 79 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact +11 pts 39 here · 28 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +8 pts 62 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -23 pts 19 here · 42 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Scalability beyond pilot
82 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Governance, capability & sustainability
79 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
39 · 28
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Efficiency
50 · 44
Sustainability (ongoing)
84 · 78
Innovation level
68 · 63
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
81 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
39 · 37
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
50 · 51
Transferability / demonstrated replication
57 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
25 · 31
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Equity & inclusion
44 · 52
Inclusiveness / equity
19 · 42

Coloured bar: Singapore. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Singapore White Paper on Women's Development (2022) — Whole-of-Government Gender Equality Action Plan · 96

ScamShield – AI-Powered National Scam Prevention Platform · 96

A11y Playground — GovTech Singapore's Public Self-Assessment Tool for Inclusive Digital Design · 92

SMEs Go Digital — Productivity Solutions Grant for Small Business Digitalisation · 92

Seniors Go Digital · 92

Grab Women Driver-Partners Programme: Closing the Gender Gap in Southeast Asia's Ride-Hailing Economy · 89

AI-Based Dengue Early Warning System — Singapore NEA's Machine-Learning Outbreak Forecasting · 87

Pair — Singapore's generative-AI assistant for public officers · 87

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Singapore concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more