evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SNAPP — Real-Time Social-Network Visualisation for Spotting Isolated Students

Australia · Wollongong · See the Australia profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 40% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

SNAPP, a free browser tool built at the University of Wollongong, turns Moodle and Blackboard discussion-forum activity into real-time social-network diagrams so instructors can spot isolated students and reflect on their own facilitation style.

SNAPP — Real-Time Social-Network Visualisation for Spotting Isolated Students

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
University of Wollongong
Period
2010–2014 (active development & evaluation; tool remained freely available afterwards)
Keywords
higher education, learning analytics, social network analysis

Context

SNAPP (Social Networks Adapting Pedagogical Practice) is a free, open-source browser scriptlet developed by Shane Dawson, Aneesha Bakharia and Elizabeth Heathcote at the University of Wollongong, Australia, first presented at the ACM Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) conference in 2011.

Objectives

To let instructors see in real time which students are central to a discussion-forum conversation and which are isolated or peripheral, by turning Moodle and Blackboard forum activity into social-network diagrams.

Activities

SNAPP scrapes discussion-forum pages from Moodle and Blackboard and renders them as social-network graphs. Because the underlying network-analysis method is fully visible rather than a black-box model, teachers could inspect exactly why a student was flagged, using the diagrams for both real-time outreach and, more commonly, post-course reflection on their own moderation style.

Results

Published documentation of SNAPP's impact is mostly descriptive and qualitative - case studies of how staff used it and what they noticed - rather than a controlled study measuring learning-outcome gains.

Conclusions

SNAPP was distributed free of charge and worked across several major learning-management systems, letting it spread beyond Wollongong, but by the mid-2010s independent maintenance had slowed as forum-scraping approaches became harder to sustain against changing LMS interfaces.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Free and open-source; no licensing cost.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Active development and evaluation ran 2010-2014; the tool remained freely available afterwards but maintenance slowed.
Staffing & skills
existing course instructors self-serving the tool; no dedicated specialist staff required

Conditions for success

  • use of a supported LMS with discussion forums (Moodle, Blackboard, Desire2Learn)
  • instructor willingness to interpret network diagrams and reflect on their own facilitation style

Common failure modes

  • reliance on browser-based forum scraping became harder to sustain as LMS interfaces changed
  • no controlled evaluation of learning-outcome impact was published

Where it fits

Governance type
university research tool
Scale
higher education institutions using Moodle, Blackboard or Desire2Learn

Commonly funded by

Horizon Europe

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful