Bedfordshire ran a published evaluation comparing its human-tutor Studiosity writing service with a new AI-augmented version. The 2024 AI trial cut average feedback turnaround from 5 hours to 2 minutes and recorded 11-21.5% grade gains in a single-institution comparison.
2,907
Students using classic service (2022/23)
8,182
Interactions, classic service (2022/23)
96%
Written-feedback satisfaction, classic service (2022/23)
~5 hours
Average feedback turnaround, classic service (2022/23)
2,913
Students in AI trial (19 Feb-3 Sep 2024)
10,152
Interactions, AI trial (19 Feb-3 Sep 2024)
~2 minutes
Average feedback turnaround, AI trial (2024)
11.1%
Grade improvement, 1st/3rd year students (2024)
21.5%
Grade improvement, 2nd year students (2024)
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
University of Bedfordshire / Studiosity
Period
2020/21 pilot; 2021/22 institution-wide; AI trial 19 Feb–3 Sep 2024; peer-reviewed evaluation published 2024
Keywords
higher education, writing feedback, student support services, retention
Context
The University of Bedfordshire piloted Studiosity, a human-marked 24/7 writing-feedback service, in 2020/21 and adopted it institution-wide from 2021/22; from 19 February to 3 September 2024 it trialled Studiosity+, an AI-augmented version run alongside the classic human-marked service.
Results
In 2022/23, 2,907 students logged 8,182 interactions with the classic service, with 96% written-feedback satisfaction, 74% live-help satisfaction, ~5-hour average turnaround, and 77% of use outside business hours. In the 2024 AI trial, 2,913 students logged 10,152 interactions, average turnaround fell to about 2 minutes, satisfaction stayed high (94%/70%), engagement rose ~50% and help-seeking moments rose ~124% versus the prior service; the published evaluation recorded grade improvements of 11.1% for first- and third-year students and 21.5% for second-year students relative to comparison groups.
Conclusions
The source cautions the grade-improvement figures come from a single institution's internal before/after comparison rather than a randomised trial, and that Studiosity co-publishes the same statistics on its own site, limiting full independence even though the study was peer-reviewed; it notes the usage and satisfaction figures are the most robust part of the evidence base.
Implementation
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmesOwn resources / municipal budget
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.