evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Sustainable Coffee Landscapes Project — Shade-Grown Agroforestry for Watershed Protection (Burundi)

Burundi · Bururi · See the Burundi profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 53% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A World Bank/GEF-financed shade-coffee agroforestry programme brought over 4,400 hectares of Burundi's erosion-prone hillsides under sustainable land and water management, reaching 18,700+ people and seeding a $30M national scale-up.

4.2 USD million
GEF grant funding (2013–2018)
18,700+ people
People benefiting (2013–2018)
9,600+ households
Households adopting shade-grown coffee (2013–2018)
4,400+ hectares
Hectares under sustainable management (2013–2018)
30 USD million
Scale-up funding (Landscape Restoration and Resilience Project) (IDA18)
Sustainable Coffee Landscapes Project — Shade-Grown Agroforestry for Watershed Protection (Burundi)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Government of Burundi / World Bank / Global Environment Facility
Period
2013–2018
Keywords
agroforestry, coffee, land restoration, sustainable agriculture, erosion control

Context

In Burundi, where about 90% of the population depends directly on natural resources and coffee provides roughly 90% of foreign-exchange earnings, decades of hillside cultivation without erosion control degraded farmland and cut coffee output from about 40,000 tonnes in the mid-1990s to 5,700 tonnes by 2003, with land degradation estimated to cost 4% of GDP a year. From 2013 to 2018 the Government of Burundi, financed by a Global Environment Facility grant channelled through the World Bank, ran the Sustainable Coffee Landscapes Project in Bubanza, Bururi and Muyinga provinces.

Activities

Farmers were trained to intercrop coffee with shade trees, bananas, beans and maize, apply terracing and other sustainable land and water management techniques, and the project supported conservation activities around the Bururi Natural Forest Reserve.

Results

The World Bank reports more than 18,700 people benefited, with over 9,600 households — nearly half female-headed — adopting shade-grown coffee across more than 4,400 hectares brought under sustainable management. Batwa community members earned enough from forest-protection and tourism work to buy land independently for what the Bank describes as the first time in Burundi's history. The approach was then scaled nationally through the $30 million Landscape Restoration and Resilience Project, targeting 80,000 households and 90,000 hectares.

Conclusions

The hectare and beneficiary figures come from World Bank programme reporting rather than an independent third-party evaluation, and no separate biodiversity, carbon-stock or fire-risk data are published for the project.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — $4.2 million GEF grant channelled through the World Bank, 2013–2018; scaled via a $30 million IDA18 Landscape Restoration and Resilience Project.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — 5-year pilot (2013–2018), followed by a multi-year national scale-up.
Staffing & skills
Government of Burundi (implementation), World Bank (grant supervision), Global Environment Facility (financing)

Conditions for success

  • Farmer training in agroforestry techniques (shade trees, intercropping) and terracing
  • Conservation activities linked to the Bururi Natural Forest Reserve
  • Follow-on national financing ($30 million IDA18 project) to scale the approach

Common failure modes

  • Hectare and beneficiary figures come from World Bank programme reporting rather than an independent third-party evaluation
  • No separate biodiversity, carbon-stock or fire-risk data are published for the project

Where it fits

Governance type
national government programme financed by a multilateral grant (GEF/World Bank)
Scale
3 provinces (Bubanza, Bururi, Muyinga)
Income level
low-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful