Top 40%
in this catalogue (918 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced2/3
GCF's project document sets an explicit, MRV-tracked target of 9.23 million tCO2e avoided, but this is a projected end-of-project figure, not yet a realised, independently confirmed result.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced1/3
Agroforestry and rangeland restoration on 275,000 ha plausibly benefits dryland biodiversity, but GCF and FAO materials report land-cover and livelihood metrics, not species-level indicators.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control2/3
Independent agronomic literature on gum-arabic systems documents improved soil moisture retention and reduced erosion in Sudan's rainfed farming zones, but this project's own soil-outcome data has not yet been published given its early implementation stage.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
No fire-risk or fire-resilience element appears in the project design or reporting reviewed.
Governance, certification & transferability2/3
The project has a formal GCF accreditation structure, a named implementing UN agency (FAO) and public disbursement tracking, but Sudan's 2023 civil war creates a major, undocumented governance and delivery risk during the remaining implementation period.
Evidoria. GAMS — Gums for Adaptation and Mitigation in Sudan. Persistent ID: c7f30a2a-cd17-45f6-a380-d333200fda83.