ANON — Croatia's AI tool for automated pseudonymisation of judicial decisions
Croatia
Croatia's Ministry of Justice deployed ANON, an AI pseudonymisation tool integrated with the national eSpis system, to automatically redact personal …
Switzerland · Lausanne · See the Switzerland profile · See the Lausanne profile
Top 62% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court trained its own judgment-anonymisation model (92.26% recall, 92.57% precision, self-reported) on two in-house GPUs and runs ChatTF with anonymised prompts for commercial models; the federal audit office reviewed it in 2026.
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgericht, Lausanne) runs AI in-house for data-protection reasons. Since 2021 it has used an AI model for quality assurance when anonymising judgments before publication; because commercial cloud computing was ruled out for data-protection reasons, the court procured two specialised GPUs and trained a legal Swiss RoBERTa-type entity-extraction model on its own premises. The court's head of IT reported recall of 92.26% and precision of 92.57% for the model, with the AI proposing additional anonymisation suggestions to human staff.
In 2025 the court introduced ChatTF, an internal alternative to commercial LLMs. Open-source models (Llama 3.3, Apertus) run without prompt anonymisation, while prompts sent to commercial models (ChatGPT, Gemini, others) are anonymised before sending and de-anonymised on return. Users rate answers with a thumbs-up so the system can be specialised to the court's needs, and the IT team advises using search engines for specific facts and LLMs for drafting, summarising and translating. Further use cases include explainable semantic search in case law.
The Swiss Federal Audit Office opened an audit of this use (sfao-25732, published 4 May 2026) asking whether the court works more efficiently thanks to AI, whether use complies with trustworthiness principles and whether synergies with other federal courts exist. The audit page gives the court's context (7,000–8,000 appeals a year, 40 judges, 170+ clerks, 2024 expenditure almost CHF 115 million, just under 7% on IT services); the detailed findings were not available to the curator.
Evidence caveat: the precision/recall figures are self-reported by the court in a conference presentation and no efficiency or time-saving measurement has been published. The practice is credible mainly as a sovereignty-first, human-in-the-loop design with independent audit scrutiny.
Read the full analysis: https://www.ch-open.ch/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/02-Daniel-Brunner.pdf
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Croatia
Croatia's Ministry of Justice deployed ANON, an AI pseudonymisation tool integrated with the national eSpis system, to automatically redact personal …
Argentina
Argentina's Ministry of Justice and SAIJ piloted generative AI across the judiciary: 5,000 court staff rated it 81% positive, and …
Argentina
Buenos Aires' Ministerio Público Fiscal deployed Prometea in 2017 to predict judicial outcomes and automate ruling drafts. 1,000 labour-rights rulings: …
Japan
Japan's Digital Agency built GENAI, a sovereign generative-AI platform deployed to all Agency staff in May 2025. One documented case …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.