evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Tracking Automated Government — a Charity-Run Register of 55 Algorithmic Tools Used in UK Public Decisions

United Kingdom · London · See the United Kingdom profile · See the London profile

Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Public Law Project (PLP), a legal charity, has kept an independent public register since February 2023: 41 tools at launch, 55 by 2025. Entries flag discrimination risk and missing impact assessments. It covers only tools PLP knows of.

Tracking Automated Government — a Charity-Run Register of 55 Algorithmic Tools Used in UK Public Decisions

Details

Promoter
Public Law Project
Period
2023-present
Keywords
algorithm register, civil society, automated decision-making, accountability

Description

In February 2023 the Public Law Project, a UK legal charity, launched the Tracking Automated Government (TAG) register to document automated and algorithmic tools used by public authorities in administrative decisions. It opened with 41 tools and listed 55 by 2025.
Each entry describes how the tool works, the factors it relies on and what is known about its potentially unequal impact. It flags where there is a risk of discrimination and where no Data Protection Impact Assessment or Equality Impact Assessment has been carried out, and can be searched by public authority. Funding of GBP 74,998 from the Nuffield Foundation supports a July 2025 to September 2026 research project by PLP on public-law litigation in the automated state.
Limits: the register includes only tools known to PLP, so it is not a complete inventory, and the sources reviewed do not describe how entries are compiled or independently verified. PLP's October 2026 'Missing Pieces' report found that only 4 of 15 automated systems it identified as still in use appeared on the government's official ATRS register, and that only one of 125 ATRS entries was linked to an Equality Impact Assessment. This shows a civil-society register can reveal gaps that an official register leaves open, but no outcome evaluation of the register itself has been published.

Read the full analysis: https://publiclawproject.org.uk/resources/the-tracking-automated-government-register/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful