What works in London
All catalogues · United Kingdom profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for London
The evidence shows London has implemented several major policy interventions with measurable outcomes. The London Living Wage Policy has impacted over 460,000 employees, delivered more than £1.6 billion in extra wages across 14,000+ accredited employers, and workers on the real Living Wage earned £4,173 more annually than those on the government minimum, with 50.3% scoring above average for psychological wellbeing versus 33.9% of non-Living Wage workers. The Mayor's Regeneration Fund allocated £70 million to areas affected by the 2011 civil disturbances, creating 660 jobs, supporting 415 businesses, and improving approximately 84,000 m² of public realm across 9 boroughs. Digital inclusion efforts through Camden and Islington NHS have provided tablet loans and digital coaching to mental health service users, with 83% of those interviewed reporting improved wellbeing.
Drawn from: United Kingdom Mandatory Gender Pay Gap Reporting (Equality Act 2010 / 2017 Regulations) · Digital Inclusion Scheme — Tablet Loans & Skills Support for Mental Health Service Users (Camden & Islington NHS) · London Living Wage Policy · Mayor’s Regeneration Fund (MRF) · Extract — Google DeepMind's Gemini Tool for Digitising the UK's Paper Planning Archives · GOV.UK Chat — the UK Government's Generative-AI Assistant for Citizen Guidance · Consult — UK Government's AI Tool for Analysing Public Consultation Responses · Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (UK)
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Teacher capability & pedagogy +50 pts 89 here · 39 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +47 pts 100 here · 53 average
Transparency, fairness & accountability +32 pts 86 here · 54 average
Inclusiveness / equity +30 pts 71 here · 41 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection +28 pts 78 here · 50 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average
Evidence of learning impact +15 pts 44 here · 30 average
Evidence of impact / measured results +10 pts 70 here · 60 average
Transferability / demonstrated replication +9 pts 68 here · 59 average
Governance, certification & transferability +8 pts 74 here · 66 average
Weaknesses
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding -10 pts 80 here · 90 average
Achievement / evidence -13 pts 80 here · 93 average
Curator validation -15 pts 60 here · 75 average
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average
Demonstrated reach -21 pts 54 here · 75 average
Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average
Impact on gender equality -23 pts 60 here · 83 average
Evaluated outcomes -24 pts 60 here · 84 average
Evaluation evidence -27 pts 8 here · 36 average
Efficiency -32 pts 20 here · 52 average
Effectiveness -41 pts 40 here · 81 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: London. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
United Kingdom Mandatory Gender Pay Gap Reporting (Equality Act 2010 / 2017 Regulations) · 100
London Living Wage Policy · 91
Mayor’s Regeneration Fund (MRF) · 91
Extract — Google DeepMind's Gemini Tool for Digitising the UK's Paper Planning Archives · 87
GOV.UK Chat — the UK Government's Generative-AI Assistant for Citizen Guidance · 87
Consult — UK Government's AI Tool for Analysing Public Consultation Responses · 87
Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (UK) · 87
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100
- Matches your scale
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Matches your scale
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more